...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Spatiotemporal changes in ecologically functional land in China: A quantity-quality coupled perspective
【24h】

Spatiotemporal changes in ecologically functional land in China: A quantity-quality coupled perspective

机译:中国生态功能性土地的时空变化:数量-质量耦合视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Finding ways to identify the coupled relationship between changes in the quantity and quality of ecologically functional land (EFL) is essential for sustainable ecosystem management. However, this coupled relationship has been ignored in the literature. This paper proposes a quality-based quantity (QBQ) method to evaluate the spatiotemporal change in EFL in China. Three Landsat images spanning 20 years were used to investigate the gains and losses of EFL. We compared the differences and linkages between the net change and QBQ change of EFL at the county scale. Continuous EFL loss and growing fragmentation were observed in China. From 1995 to 2015, the main cause of EFL loss was desertification, followed by farmland occupation and construction land consolidation. It should be noted that the EFL loss from 2005 to 2015 was much higher than that from 1995 to 2005. The main gain in EFL was from desert land exploitation, followed by farmland return and construction land consolidation. In particular, grassland degradation was the most severe ecological problem in western China. The QBQ change in EFL showed a more severe situation than did the quantity change. The dynamic processes associated with quantity change and their effects on landscape were well reflected in the QBQ change. These results indicated that the EFL degraded in both quantity and quality in China between 1995 and 2015. EFL conservation policies should focus not only on the dynamic losses and gains in quantity but also on the changes in quality linked to landscape patterns. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:寻找方法来识别生态功能土地(EFL)的数量和质量变化之间的耦合关系对于可持续的生态系统管理至关重要。但是,这种耦合关系在文献中已被忽略。本文提出了一种基于质量的数量(QBQ)方法来评估中国的英语外语时空变化。使用三张横跨20年的Landsat图像来研究EFL的收益和损失。我们比较了县域范围内EFL的净变化和QBQ变化之间的差异和联系。在中国观察到持续的EFL损失和越来越多的分裂。从1995年到2015年,EFL损失的主要原因是荒漠化,其次是农田占用和建设用地整理。应当指出的是,2005年至2015年的EFL损失比1995年至1995年的损失要高得多。EFL的主要收益来自荒漠土地开发,其次是农田退还和建设用地整理。特别是草地退化是中国西部最严重的生态问题。 EFL中的QBQ变化比数量变化更为严重。 QBQ变化充分反映了与数量变化相关的动态过程及其对景观的影响。这些结果表明,从1995年到2015年,中国的EFL在数量和质量上都在下降。EFL保护政策不仅应关注数量的动态损失和收益,而且还应关注与景观格局相关的质量变化。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号