首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >The impacts of uncertainties on the carbon mitigation design: Perspective from abatement cost and emission rate
【24h】

The impacts of uncertainties on the carbon mitigation design: Perspective from abatement cost and emission rate

机译:不确定性对减碳设计的影响:减排成本和排放率的视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, we use a stochastic dynamic programming model to evaluate the impacts of uncertainties on the abatement planning process. By involving the endogenous emission path, we differentiate two types of uncertainties during the planning process, which come from the volatility of the abatement cost and the ambiguity of emission rate. Results suggest that the considered uncertainties influence the decision-making process in several aspects by shaping the abatement path as well as emission path. (1) The impacts vary with the expected value and the level of variance of the uncertainty effects. Uncertainties caused by abatement costs from 0.02 to 0.06 and emission factors from 0.01 to 0.03 increase the total abatement costs around 7% and 5% respectively. (2) Both of these uncertainties can generate precautionary abatement in short-term. Especially during the early stages, the abatement task will be increased by 1% around in each period due to the uncertainties. However such an action will be diminishing as the duration elapses. (3) Both of these uncertainties influence the long-term abatement performances, however, with different forms and mechanisms. With small volatility, the emission rate changes the priority sequence of abatement actions more substantially in the short-term than the emission rate does. (4) The combined uncertainties can behave in a compound way to improve the uncertainty performance in the model. The difference between the emission peaks of conservative and extreme cases is significant with the gap being about 5 million metric ton. These results have potentially important policy implications and can provide a rationale for abatement actions. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在本文中,我们使用随机动态规划模型来评估不确定性对减排规划过程的影响。通过涉及内生排放路径,我们在规划过程中区分了两种类型的不确定性,这两种类型的不确定性来自减排成本的波动性和排放率的不确定性。结果表明,所考虑的不确定性通过影响减排路径和排放路径而在多个方面影响决策过程。 (1)影响随期望值和不确定性影响的方差水平而变化。减排成本从0.02降低到0.06所导致的不确定性以及排放因子从0.01降低到0.03所引起的不确定性分别使总减排成本增加了大约7%和5%。 (2)这两种不确定性都会在短期内产生预防性减排。特别是在早期阶段,由于不确定性,减排任务将在每个时期内增加大约1%。但是,随着时间的流逝,这种动作将逐渐减少。 (3)这两种不确定性都会以不同的形式和机制影响长期减排表现。波动率较小时,排放量在短期内会比排放量更显着地改变减排行动的优先顺序。 (4)组合的不确定性可以以复合方式表现,以提高模型中的不确定性性能。保守案例和极端案例的排放峰值之间的差异非常大,差距大约为500万吨。这些结果可能具有重要的政策含义,并可以为减排行动提供依据。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Cleaner Production》 |2019年第20期|213-223|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci & Dev, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China|Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China;

    Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci & Dev, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China|Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China;

    Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci & Dev, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China|Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China;

    Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Res Ctr Informat Technol & Social & Econ Dev, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, Peoples R China|Chinese Acad Sci, Acad Math & Syst Sci, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Climate change mitigation; Abatement strategy; Abatement uncertainty; Stochastic dynamic programming;

    机译:缓解气候变化;减排策略;减排不确定性;随机动态规划;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号