...
首页> 外文期刊>Clean technologies and environmental policy >Cost-efficient emission abatement of energy and transportation technologies: mitigation costs and policy impacts for Belgium
【24h】

Cost-efficient emission abatement of energy and transportation technologies: mitigation costs and policy impacts for Belgium

机译:具有成本效益的能源和运输技术减排:比利时的减排成本和政策影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In the light of global warming, this paper develops a framework to compare energy and transportation technologies in terms of cost-efficient GHG emission reduction. We conduct a simultaneous assessment of economic and environmental performances through life cycle costing and life cycle assessment. To calculate the GHG mitigation cost, we create reference systems within the base scenario. Further, we extend the concept of the mitigation cost, allowing (ⅰ) comparision of technologies given a limited investment resource, and (ⅱ) evaluation of the direct impact of policy measures by means of the subsidized mitigation cost. The framework is illustrated with a case of solar photovoltaics (PV), grid powered battery electric vehicles (BEVs), and solar powered BEVs for a Belgian small and medium sized enterprise. The study's conclusions are that the mitigation cost of solar PV is high, even though this is a mature technology. The emerging mass produced BEVs on the other hand are found to have a large potential for cost-efficient GHG mitigation as indicated by their low cost of mitigation. Finally, based on the subsidized mitigation cost, we conclude that the current financial stimuli for all three investigated technologies are excessive when compared to the CO_2 market value under the EU Emission Trading Scheme.
机译:鉴于全球变暖,本文建立了一个框架,以经济高效的温室气体减排量比较能源和运输技术。我们通过生命周期成本和生命周期评估对经济和环境绩效进行同步评估。为了计算温室气​​体减排成本,我们在基本方案中创建了参考系统。此外,我们扩展了缓解成本的概念,允许(ⅰ)比较投资资源有限的技术,以及(ⅱ)通过补贴的缓解成本评估政策措施的直接影响。以比利时的一家中小型企业的太阳能光伏(PV),并网电池电动车(BEV)和太阳能BEV为例说明了该框架。该研究的结论是,尽管这是一项成熟的技术,但其缓解成本却很高。另一方面,新兴的批量生产的BEV被发现具有低成本减排温室气体的巨大潜力,这表明它们的减排成本很低。最后,基于补贴的减排成本,我们得出的结论是,与欧盟排放交易计划下的CO_2市场价值相比,这三种研究技术的当前财务刺激都过高。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Clean technologies and environmental policy》 |2014年第6期|1107-1118|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Centre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Agoralaan - Building D, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium;

    Centre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Agoralaan - Building D, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium;

    Centre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Agoralaan - Building D, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium;

    Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, University of Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 44-2450, Louvain, Belgium,Gestion de l'Environnement, Societe et Territoire (GESTe), Institute for Environmental Management and Land Use Planning (IGEAT), Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Avenue Franklin D. Roosevelt 50 CP 130/02, 1050 Brussels, Belgium;

    Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, University of Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 44-2450, Louvain, Belgium;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Energy policy; Transportation policy; Photovoltaics; Battery electric vehicles; Life cycle (cost) assessment;

    机译:能源政策;运输政策;光伏;电动汽车生命周期(成本)评估;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号