首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Civil Society >The Limits and Possibilities of Third Sector Europeanization
【24h】

The Limits and Possibilities of Third Sector Europeanization

机译:第三部门欧洲化的局限性和可能性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Policy-making on the third sector as a subject of policy in the Member States of the European Union is primarily a matter for domestic (national and sub-national) public authorities, working in collaboration with the third sector itself and other policy actors. However, over the past 25 years, the European Union (EU) collectively has increasingly taken an interest in this sphere. Most of this activity has been low visibility and ‘soft’ in character, with implemented initiatives not involving direct, mandatory or ‘hard’ intervention in domestic policy communities by the EU. But it has involved significant commitments of EU financial resources and periods of sustained multi-level collective policy effort. It therefore merits attention from scholarly and policy viewpoints. Drawing on the findings of a major multi-country study of horizontal third sector policy (i.e. cross-cutting policy pertaining to the sector as a whole), this article interprets this phenomenon through the lens of the ‘Europeanization’ literature. This literature is sensitive to the possibility that policy linkages between the EU and other pan-European institutions and country-level policy communities can be significant and consequential even if they do not involve primary law-making or administrative fiat on the part of the originating bodies. The article reviews the extent to which Europeanization, understood in three related but distinctive ways, has proceeded over the past quarter of a century and discusses the causes and consequences of this process. The article shows that overall, relatively modest and very uneven progress towards third sector Europeanization can be said to have proceeded on this account. It reviews why this has tended to be the case and also discusses the conditions under which third sector European policy has managed to proceed relatively effectively and productively.View full textDownload full textKeywordsCivil society, third sector, Europeanization, policy process, public policyRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2010.481937
机译:在欧洲联盟成员国中,将第三部门的政策制定作为政策主题,主要是与第三部门本身和其他政策参与者合作的国内(国家和地方以下)公共当局的事务。但是,在过去的25年中,欧洲联盟(EU)对这一领域越来越感兴趣。大部分活动的知名度低且具有“软性”,已实施的举措不涉及欧盟对国内政策社区的直接,强制性或“硬性”干预。但是,这涉及欧盟财政资源的重大承诺以及持续的多层次集体政策努力时期。因此,它从学术和政策角度值得关注。本文基于对第三部门横向横向政策(即与整个部门相关的跨领域政策)的一项重大跨国研究结果,通过“欧洲化”文献的角度解释了这一现象。该文献对欧盟与其他泛欧机构和国家/地区级政策团体之间的政策联系可能具有重要意义和影响力的可能性很敏感,即使它们不涉及发起机构的主要立法或行政命令。本文回顾了过去二十五年来,以三种相关但独特的方式理解了欧洲化的程度,并讨论了这一过程的成因和后果。该文章表明,可以说,第三部门欧洲化的总体,相对适度和非常不平衡的进展是基于这个原因而进行的。本文回顾了为何会如此,并讨论了第三部门欧洲政策设法相对有效和富有成效地进行的条件。查看全文下载全文关键字民间社会,第三部门,欧洲化,政策过程,公共政策相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2010.481937

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号