首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Civil Society >Civility as a Public Opinion: Theorizing Civility and Discussing an Attitude Survey-Based Research Agenda
【24h】

Civility as a Public Opinion: Theorizing Civility and Discussing an Attitude Survey-Based Research Agenda

机译:文明作为民意:理论化的文明并讨论基于态度调查的研究议程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Focusing on the normative dimension of civil society requires an explicit reference to the neglected notion of civility, which is a quasi non-existent concept in empirical sociology and beyond. To address this shortcoming, at first the article theorizes about civility as a disposition realized in individual attitudes. This conceptualization implicates a research agenda for civil society studies that transcends the organizational level. Second, a literature review contrasts research traditions which understand civility solely as good manners in interpersonal behaviour to civility as a public opinion: Civility is defined through attitudes and beliefs regarding a hypothetical universalizing community. In this context, the article discusses a Bourdieusian critique of macro-sociological investigations based on the aggregation of micro-level data (‘Public opinion does not exist’). Finally, I demonstrate that an explicit construction of the object under investigation implies specific research methods, which explains why and how large-scale attitude surveys play an important role in operationalizing the sociological understanding of civility proposed in this article.View full textDownload full textKeywordsCivility, macro-sociology, public opinion, research methodsRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2012.704672
机译:着眼于公民社会的规范性维度,需要明确提及被忽略的文明概念,这在经验社会学及以后的社会学中是一种不存在的概念。为了解决这个缺点,本文首先将文明作为个人态度实现的理论进行理论化。这种概念化意味着超越组织层面的民间社会研究议程。其次,文献综述将仅将文明理解为人际交往行为的良好方式的研究传统与作为公众舆论的文明进行了对比:文明是通过对假设的普遍化社区的态度和信念来定义的。在这种情况下,本文讨论了基于微观数据汇总(“不存在民意”)的宏观社会学研究的布迪厄式批评。最后,我证明了对被调查对象的明确构造意味着特定的研究方法,这解释了大规模态度调查为何以及如何在操作本文所提出的文明社会学理解方面发挥重要作用。查看全文下载全文关键字Civility,宏观社会学,舆论,研究方法相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,pubid: “ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2012.704672

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号