首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers >The study of the relationship between IRI and 3m-straightedge acceptance specification
【24h】

The study of the relationship between IRI and 3m-straightedge acceptance specification

机译:IRI与3m直尺验收规范之间关系的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Due to the expectation of high pavement riding quality by road users, road agencies must enhance their ability to evaluate and manage pavement roughness. As technology has developed, manual and random sampling methods for pavement roughness evaluation have gradually been replaced by fully automated computer systems. Subsequently, the international roughness index (IRI) that is time-stable, transportable, relevant, and valid, was developed and has been generally accepted worldwide. However, some Asian countries still use a 3m-straightedge to evaluate pavement roughness under a fixed sampling interval and determine construction acceptance levels by calculating the standard deviation. To examine the correlation between IRI and standard deviation of the 3 m straightedge, this paper first utilizes power spectral density (PSD) and pavement profile simulation to analyze the measured longitudinal profiles in the long-term pavement performance (LTPP) database. The results demonstrate that the IRI values are positively correlated to PSD values in short wavelengths (0.5 to 3 m), while standard deviation and PSD values are negatively correlated. The index stability of the standard deviation as well as the IRI for the same pavement section is investigated in detail. This paper utilizes the pavement profile reversing simulation to analyze 195 longitudinal profiles of freeway and urban roads in Taiwan. The results show that the larger the PSD values in short wavelengths, the greater the variation of the standard deviation due to different measuring points. It concludes that the standard deviation of the 3 m straightedge is not appropriate for use as the acceptance index for any pavement sections with relatively rough surface, say IRI 2 m/km. From the findings of this study, a revised acceptance specification of standard deviation, 1.4 mm, for 3 m straightedge is proposed for the Taiwan Freeway authority before IRI is fully adopted in Taiwan.View full textDownload full textKeywordsinternational roughness index, power spectral density, standard deviation of 3 m straightedgeRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2012.655907
机译:由于道路使用者希望获得较高的人行道骑行质量,因此道路机构必须增强其评估和管理人行道粗糙度的能力。随着技术的发展,用于路面粗糙度评估的手动和随机采样方法已逐渐被全自动计算机系统所取代。随后,制定了稳定,可运输,相关且有效的国际粗糙度指数(IRI),并已在世界范围内普遍接受。但是,某些亚洲国家/地区仍使用3m直线度来评估固定采样间隔下的路面粗糙度,并通过计算标准偏差来确定施工验收水平。若要检查IRI和3毫米直尺的标准偏差之间的相关性,本文首先利用功率谱密度(PSD)和路面轮廓模拟来分析在长期路面性能(LTPP)数据库中测得的纵向轮廓。结果表明,IRI值与短波长(0.5至3μm)的PSD值正相关,而标准偏差和PSD值则呈负相关。详细研究了同一路面的标准偏差和IRI的指数稳定性。本文利用路面轮廓反转模拟分析了台湾的195条高速公路和城市道路的纵向轮廓。结果表明,短波长的PSD值越大,由于测量点不同,标准偏差的变化越大。结论是:3 m直尺的标准偏差不适合用作任何具有相对粗糙表面的路面断面的接受指标,例如IRI> 2 µm / km。根据这项研究的结果,在台湾全面采用IRI之前,台湾高速公路管理局提出了针对3毫米直尺的标准偏差1.4毫米的修订验收规范。查看全文下载全文关键字国际粗糙度指数,功率谱密度,3 m直尺的标准偏差相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多” ,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2012.655907

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号