首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Child and Family Studies >Is the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program Acceptable to Parents from Culturally Diverse Backgrounds?
【24h】

Is the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program Acceptable to Parents from Culturally Diverse Backgrounds?

机译:来自不同文化背景的父母可以接受三重P阳性育儿计划吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Behavioural parenting programs are an effective intervention for behavioural and emotional problems in children, however these programs have low utilisation rates by culturally diverse parents. We examined the cultural acceptability of program materials, preferences for delivery methods, and barriers to use of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. One hundred and thirty seven parents watched a video outlining the 17 strategies in Triple P and read through a tip sheet before completing a series of questionnaires. Results revealed that parents found the strategies highly acceptable, highly useful, were very likely to use the strategies and reported currently using the strategies often. They also rated the program materials as very culturally appropriate and identified group, seminar, television, and individual as the most preferred delivery methods. Parents identified location and timing of services, financial cost, and competing work commitments as the most frequently cited barriers to accessing a parenting intervention. The findings of this study suggest that elements of parenting programs may not be contributing to the low rates of access among culturally diverse parents. These findings highlight the need for more research addressing variables that may contribute to increasing culturally diverse parents’ access of behavioural parenting programs.
机译:行为育儿计划是对儿童行为和情绪问题的有效干预,但是,这些计划的使用率因文化差异而异。我们研究了计划材料的文化可接受性,对分娩方式的偏爱以及使用三重P阳性育儿计划的障碍。一百三十七名父母观看了一段视频,概述了Triple P中的17种策略,并通读了提示表,然后填写了一系列问卷。结果显示,父母发现该策略高度可接受,非常有用,极有可能使用该策略,并报告当前经常使用该策略。他们还对计划材料进行了非常合乎文化的评价,并确定小组,研讨会,电视和个人是最优选的交付方式。父母将服务的地点和时间,财务成本以及竞争性的工作承诺确定为获得育儿干预措施时最常提及的障碍。这项研究的结果表明,育儿计划的要素可能不会导致文化多样性的父母之间的获取率低。这些发现突出表明,有必要针对可能导致文化差异的父母增加行为育儿计划的机会的变量进行更多研究。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Child and Family Studies》 |2011年第5期|p.614-622|共9页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:20:33

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号