首页> 外文期刊>Journal of business venturing >Where did interpretivism go in the theory of entrepreneurship?
【24h】

Where did interpretivism go in the theory of entrepreneurship?

机译:解释主义在创业理论中去了哪里?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I argue that an interpretivist philosophic approach has been neglected in modern entrepreneurship research, but that such an approach may be most appropriate to the individualist nature of entrepreneurship. Realist meta-theories suffer from issues of paradigm incommensurability that may be at the heart of the present difficulties in defining and delineating the field of entrepreneurship. Interpretivism offers a potentially groundbreaking philosophical alternative that highlights the source of entrepreneurship in individuals rather than in abstract markets, emphasizing emergence rather than presuming opportunity existence. In this paper I defend interpretivism against its critics and revisit the nature of entrepreneurship through this lens. I show that process theories of entrepreneurship are aligned with interpretivist meta-theory, and that their explicit adoption of an interpretivist foundation may better facilitate theoretical progress. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:我认为,解释主义哲学方法在现代企业家精神研究中已被忽略,但是这种方法可能最适合企业家精神的个人主义性质。现实主义的元理论存在范式不可通约性的问题,这可能是当前定义和描绘企业家精神领域的困难的核心。诠释主义提供了一种潜在的突破性的哲学选择,它强调了个人而不是抽象市场中企业家精神的来源,强调了出现而不是假定机会的存在。在本文中,我捍卫解释主义反对批评家,并通过这种视角重新审视了企业家精神的本质。我证明企业家的过程理论与解释主义的元理论是一致的,并且他们明确地采用解释主义的基础可能会更好地促进理论发展。 (C)2017 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号