...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of business strategy >Does the concept of 'creating shared value' hold water?
【24h】

Does the concept of 'creating shared value' hold water?

机译:“创造共享价值”的概念是否成立?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In its entirety, the sentiment of CSV is sensible - if society fails, so does business. The financial crisis provides an example of the symbiosis between corporate performance and social well-being: and of the obligations faced by businesses and the government to confirm that business behaves in ways which advance the public and private good. The objective is not to look at CSV in its entirety, but rather to focus on its representation of water use, delving deeper into what CSV means for this specific and unique resource. The central tenet of both water stewardship and CSV - that companies share a need with the public for reliable water services and sustainable water resources management - is sound. Inevitably, some companies will demonstrate the foresight to recognize incentives for engaging more with society and the environment in mind. Trends in water resources suggest that many will have no choice. CSV theory needs to be better-supported with evidence from other science and policy domains which account for water realities in a hydrological and social sense to better-reflect business water risk. Without articulating how society benefits from better water management and what the role of companies is within that, CSV may remain solidly embedded in notions of resource efficiency and savings, often with poor water resource stewardship outcomes. Water challenges require much more from business than just estimating water volumes and reducing usage compared to targets; this thinking is perhaps the result of how companies address greenhouse gas emissions. Effective water stewardship requires an understanding of how external conditions define the risks to business now and under changing demographics and climate, and anticipates how business will respond to these issues at a local level. Efficient irrigation equipment and water reduction schemes may be enough to manage resources, even at impressive, albeit elementary, levels in the realm of shared value, but they are likely to be insufficient in the wider realm of risk mitigation and water resource management for society and business. We propose integrating water stewardship thinking into CSV to address an increasingly important private and public sector challenge - how to provide access to water for ecosystems, businesses, agriculture and society.
机译:总体而言,CSV的观点是明智的-如果社会失败,企业也将失败。金融危机提供了一个例子,说明企业绩效与社会福祉之间的共生关系;以及企业和政府在确认企业行为以促进公共和私人利益的方式方面所承担的义务。目的不是要完整地了解CSV,而是要专注于其用水量的表示,更深入地研究CSV对于这种特定而独特的资源的含义。水资源管理和CSV的中心原则是正确的-公司与公众共同需要可靠的水服务和可持续的水资源管理。不可避免地,一些公司将展示出远见卓识,以认识到鼓励人们更多地参与社会和环境的动机。水资源趋势表明,许多人别无选择。 CSV理论需要得到其他科学和政策领域的证据的更好支持,这些证据在水文和社会意义上解释了水的现实状况,以更好地反映商业用水风险。在没有阐明社会如何从更好的水资源管理中受益以及公司在其中的作用的情况下,CSV可能会牢固地嵌入到资源效率和节约的观念中,而水资源管理的结果往往很差。与目标相比,水的挑战不仅需要估计水量和减少用水量,还需要更多的业务。这种想法也许是公司如何解决温室气体排放的结果。有效的水资源管理需要了解外部条件如何定义当前以及在不断变化的人口和气候下企业面临的风险,并期望企业如何在本地层面应对这些问题。高效的灌溉设备和节水计划可能足以管理资源,即使是在共享价值领域令人印象深刻(尽管是基本的)水平上,但在更广泛的风险缓解和社会和水资源管理领域中,它们可能仍然不足。商业。我们建议将水资源管理思想纳入CSV,以应对日益重要的私营和公共部门挑战-如何为生态系统,企业,农业和社会提供水源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号