首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Research >Divergence between informant and archival measures of the environment: Real differences, artifact, or perceptual error?
【24h】

Divergence between informant and archival measures of the environment: Real differences, artifact, or perceptual error?

机译:环境的信息提供者和归档度量之间的差异:实际差异,伪像或感知错误?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Although organizational environments are a central concern for researchers in organization theory and strategy, many researchers report that informant assessments and archival measures of the environment do not converge. This study investigates whether the observed divergence can be attributed to perceptual error, to real differences in constructive definitions, to differences between a firm's environment and an aggregate industry environment, or simply to methodological artifacts. Results show that environmental uncertainty and environmental variation are distinct multidimensional constructs even when only informant measures from the same respondents are considered, and that organizational level mediating filters are more strongly related to informant measures of environmental variation than to environmental uncertainty. However, the effects of individual level filters on environmental variation do not decrease after controlling for organizational level filters. We conclude that, although there are some real differences between informant and archival measures of the environment, the possibility of perceptual bias cannot be ruled out.
机译:尽管组织环境是组织理论和策略研究人员的主要关注点,但许多研究人员报告说,对环境的知情评估和归档措施并未融合。这项研究调查了观察到的差异是否可归因于感知错误,构造性定义的实际差异,公司环境与整体行业环境之间的差异,还是仅归因于方法论上的因素。结果表明,即使仅考虑来自同一受访者的知情人措施,环境不确定性和环境变化也是不同的多维结构,并且组织水平的中介过滤器与环境变化的知情人措施相比与环境不确定性更紧密相关。但是,在控制组织级别过滤器之后,各个级别过滤器对环境变化的影响不会降低。我们得出的结论是,尽管知情者和环境档案措施之间存在某些实际差异,但不能排除感知偏差的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号