首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Research >Government intervention and corporate policies: Evidence from China
【24h】

Government intervention and corporate policies: Evidence from China

机译:政府干预与公司政策:来自中国的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study examines two channels through which Chinese government intervenes in business activities: direct intervention via government ownership and indirect intervention via strategic development plans in selected areas. The findings show that these interventions affect corporate policies differently and have opposite effects on financing policies: while firms with higher level of government ownership tend to use higher leverage, more long-term debt and hold less cash, and such effects are more pronounced with central government ownership, reverse effect is related with strategic development plans. In addition, the study shows that indirect intervention alleviates the impact of direct intervention on firms' financing policy. In terms of investment policies, both forms of intervention are related to higher investment expenditures and poorer performance. The effect of government ownership on firms' leverage has become less significant after the establishment of corporate bond market in China. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究考察了中国政府干预商业活动的两种渠道:通过政府所有权的直接干预和通过选定地区的战略发展计划的间接干预。研究结果表明,这些干预措施对公司政策的影响不同,并且对融资政策产生相反的影响:虽然拥有更高政府所有权的公司倾向于使用更高的杠杆率,但更多的长期债务却持有更少的现金,而中央政府的这种影响更加明显。政府所有制的反向作用与战略发展计划有关。此外,研究表明间接干预减轻了直接干预对企业融资政策的影响。在投资政策方面,两种干预形式都与较高的投资支出和较差的绩效有关。在中国建立公司债券市场之后,政府所有权对企业杠杆的影响变得不那么重要了。 (C)2014 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号