首页> 外文期刊>Journal of business logistics >Reconsidering the Supply Chain Integration-Performance Relationship: In Search of Theoretical Consistency and Clarity
【24h】

Reconsidering the Supply Chain Integration-Performance Relationship: In Search of Theoretical Consistency and Clarity

机译:重新考虑供应链的整合绩效关系:寻求理论上的一致性和清晰性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Supply chain integration (SCI) purportedly helps firms achieve performance returns on supply chain management (SCM) activities and resource investments that exceed the sums of their parts. Thus, several of the SCM field's seminal models focus on SCI as a central construct. However, the rapid development of literature on SCI has yielded some inconsistent and confusing findings. For example, two recent meta-analyses of the SCI-per-formance relationship have attempted to clarify SCI's identity and value (authored by Leuschner et al. 2013, and Mackelprang et al. 2014). Both were rigorously executed and based on their differing initial assumptions, appear to be "right." But, they derive different conclusions pertaining to the overall "value proposition" of SCI. How can this be?
机译:据称,供应链集成(SCI)可帮助企业在供应链管理(SCM)活动和资源投资方面取得超过其部门总和的绩效回报。因此,一些SCM领域的开创性模型将SCI作为主要结构。但是,关于SCI的文献的迅速发展产生了一些不一致和令人困惑的发现。例如,最近两次对SCI-绩效关系的荟萃分析试图阐明SCI的身份和价值(Leuschner等,2013; Mackelprang等,2014)。两者都经过严格执行,并且根据其不同的初始假设,似乎是“正确的”。但是,他们得出了与SCI总体“价值主张”有关的不同结论。怎么会这样?

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of business logistics》 |2014年第3期|275-276|共2页
  • 作者单位

    The University of Tennessee, 307 Stokely Management Center, Knoxville, TN 37996-0530, USA University of Bath;

    The University of Tennessee;

    The University of Tennessee;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号