首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Sustainable Development: Lost Meaning and Opportunity?
【24h】

Sustainable Development: Lost Meaning and Opportunity?

机译:可持续发展:失去意义和机会?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The term Sustainable Development has been used in many different contexts and consequently has come to represent many different ideas. The purpose of this paper was to explore the underlying meaning of the term Sustainable Development, and to assess the dominant ethic behind such meaning. Through this exploration, we uncovered a change in the semantic meaning of the term, and described what that meaning entails. The term Sustainable Development had the potential, we argue, to stimulate discursive engagement with respect to the future development of society within an ethical framework based around the values of inclusivity, diversity, and integration. The importance of philosophical context within which the term is used influences the definitional process of meaning, and has been simulated into the language of the dominant scientific-economic paradigm. We go on to explore how this meaning change has come about. In doing so we looked to the Enlightenment period and the resulting philosophies to explore the foundations of meaning, and then to the work of Juergen Habermas to explain how the scientific-economic paradigm came to dominate the meaning of Sustainable Development.
机译:可持续发展一词已在许多不同的背景下使用,因此代表了许多不同的想法。本文的目的是探讨“可持续发展”一词的潜在含义,并评估其背后的主要道德观。通过这一探索,我们发现了该术语的语义含义的变化,并描述了该含义的含义。我们认为,“可持续发展”一词有可能在基于包容性,多样性和融合的价值观的道德框架内,促进对社会未来发展的话语参与。在其中使用该术语的哲学语境的重要性会影响意义的定义过程,并且已被模拟为主要的科学-经济范式的语言。我们继续探索这种意义变化是如何发生的。在此过程中,我们考察了启蒙运动时期和由此产生的哲学,以探索意义的基础,然后考察尤尔根·哈贝马斯(Juergen Habermas)的工作,以解释科学经济范式如何成为支配可持续发展意义的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号