首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability
【24h】

From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability

机译:从利益相关者管理到利益相关者问责制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Confronted with mounting pressure to ensure accountability vis-a-vis customers, citizens and beneficiaries, organizational leaders need to decide how to choose and implement so-called accountability standards. Yet while looking for an appropriate standard, they often base their decisions on cost-benefit calculations, thus neglecting other important spheres of influence pertaining to more broadly defined stakeholder interests. We argue in this paper that, as a part of the strategic decision for a certain standard, management needs to identify and act according to the needs of all stakeholders. We contend that the creation of a dialogical understanding among affected stakeholders cannot be a mere outcome of applying certain accountability standards, but rather must be a necessary precondition for their use. This requires a stakeholder dialogue prior to making a choice. We outline such a discursive decision framework for accountability standards based on the Habermasian concept of communicative action and, in the final section, apply our conceptual framework to one of the most prominent accountability tools (AA 1000).
机译:面对不断增加的压力以确保对客户,公民和受益人的问责制,组织负责人需要决定如何选择和实施所谓的问责制标准。然而,在寻找合适的标准时,他们常常将决策基于成本效益计算,从而忽略了与利益相关者利益更为广泛相关的其他重要影响领域。在本文中,我们认为,作为针对某个标准的战略决策的一部分,管理层需要根据所有利益相关者的需求确定并采取行动。我们认为,在受影响的利益相关者之间建立对话理解不仅是应用某些问责标准的结果,而且必须是使用它们的必要先决条件。这要求在做出选择之前与利益相关者进行对话。我们基于哈贝马斯的交往行动概念概述了这种问责制标准的决策决策框架,并在最后一节中将我们的概念框架应用于最著名的问责工具之一(AA 1000)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号