首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Gender Differences in Double Standards
【24h】

Gender Differences in Double Standards

机译:双重标准中的性别差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purpose of the present study is to investigate gender differences in the use of double standards in ethical judgements of questionable conduct instigated by business or consumers. We investigate if consumers are more critical towards unethical corporate versus consumer actions and if these double standards depend on the gender of the respondent. In the first study, we compared evaluations of four specific unethical actions [cfr. DePaulo, 1987, in: J. Saegert (ed.) Proceedings of the Division of Consumer Psychology (American Psychological Association, Washington DC)] instigated by either the consumer or the corporation. In a second study, we investigated the perception of some general consumer and corporate (un)ethical actions in addition to DePaulo's unethical scenarios. Both researches show that females are less likely to use double standards when it comes to their own (un)ethical behaviour compared to corporate (un)ethical actions. Furthermore, gender differences in the use of double standards depend on the type of unethical behaviour. Limitations and suggestions for further research are discussed.
机译:本研究的目的是调查在企业或消费者煽动的可疑行为的道德判断中使用双重标准时的性别差异。我们调查了消费者对于不道德的公司行为与消费者行为相比是否更为重要,以及这些双重标准是否取决于受访者的性别。在第一项研究中,我们比较了对四种特定的不道德行为的评估[cfr。 DePaulo,1987年,在:J. Saegert(编),消费者心理学分会(美国心理学会,华盛顿特区),由消费者或公司发起。在第二项研究中,除了DePaulo的不道德情景之外,我们还调查了一些一般消费者和公司(不道德)行为的看法。两项研究均表明,与公司(不道德)行为相比,女性在自身(不道德)行为方面使用双重标准的可能性较小。此外,在使用双重标准方面的性别差异取决于不道德行为的类型。讨论了进一步研究的局限性和建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号