首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Relative Importance Measurement of the Moral Intensity Dimensions
【24h】

Relative Importance Measurement of the Moral Intensity Dimensions

机译:道德强度维度的相对重要性度量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The relative importance of the Jones' [Jones, T. M.: 1991, Academy of Management Review 16(2), 366-395] six components of moral intensity was measured using a conjoint experimental design. The most important components influencing ethical perceptions were: probability of effect, magnitude of consequences, and temporal immediacy. Contrary to previous research, overall social consensus was not an important factor. However, consumers exhibit distinctly different patterns in ethical evaluation, and for approximately 15% of respondents social consensus was the most important dimension.
机译:Jones的相对重要性[Jones,T. M .: 1991,管理学院评论16(2),366-395]使用联合实验设计测量了道德强度的六个组成部分。影响道德观念的最重要因素是:影响的可能性,后果的严重性和时间上的即时性。与先前的研究相反,总体社会共识不是重要因素。但是,消费者在道德评价方面表现出截然不同的模式,对于约15%的受访者而言,社会共识是最重要的方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号