首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Gap (RED): Social Responsibility Campaign or Window Dressing?
【24h】

Gap (RED): Social Responsibility Campaign or Window Dressing?

机译:差距(红色):社会责任运动还是橱窗装饰?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study interrogates the Gap (RED) campaign from a political economic perspective to determine whether it goes beyond merely touting the virtuous line of social responsibility. Critics cite the irony of capitalist-based solutions that perpetuate the inequities they are trying to address. Others suggest the aid generated is problematic in and of itself because it keeps Africa from becoming self-sufficient. This research contends the purpose of the Gap's participation is genuine, going beyond window dressing and the surface level benefit of capitalistic enterprise, and is in fact linked to a higher motive of propagating ethical trade which ultimately offers African beneficiaries a path to financial independence. However, because the message of the current Gap (RED) advertising campaign does convey a false sense of doing good, another advertising approach is warranted.
机译:这项研究从政治经济学的角度审视了Gap(RED)运动,以确定它是否超越了仅仅吹捧社会责任的良性路线。评论家援引基于资本主义的解决方案的讽刺意味,这种解决方案使他们试图解决的不平等现象永久存在。其他人则认为,所产生的援助本身就存在问题,因为它使非洲无法自给自足。这项研究认为,Gap参与的目的是真诚的,超越了装潢和资本主义企业的表面利益,并且实际上与传播道德贸易的更高动机有关,这最终为非洲受益人提供了财务独立的途径。但是,由于当前Gap(RED)广告活动的消息确实传达了一种错误的行善感,因此需要另一种广告方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号