The Nestle Infant Formula Controversy and a Strange Web of Subsequent Business Scandals

摘要

The marketing of infant formula in third-world countries in the 1970s by Nestle S.A. gave rise to a consumer boycott that came to be a widely taught case study in the field of Business Ethics. This article extends that case study by identifying three specific individuals who were associated with managing Nestle's response to that boycott. It reveals their subsequent direct involvement in a number of additional "classic" 1980s business scandals (some of which ended with major criminal trials and the imprisonment of eminent business figures)—and describes tangential linkages to other business scandals of the time. The article discloses a behind-the-scenes pattern of business villainy, adding both depth and breadth to previous accounts of these scandals. The article offers a conceptual framework that goes beyond personal greed as an explanatory factor for such unethical behavior in the business world, suggesting the presence of personal and organizational networks of intrigue and opportunity. The linkages between the scandals suggest an epidemiological process with the plotters acting as "virus" carriers contaminating various corporate cultures.