首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >MacIntyrean Virtue Ethics in Business: A Cross-Cultural Comparison
【24h】

MacIntyrean Virtue Ethics in Business: A Cross-Cultural Comparison

机译:MacIntyrean商业道德观念:跨文化比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper seeks to establish whether the categories of MacIntyrean virtue ethics as applied to business organizations are meaningful in a non-western business context. It does so by building on research reported in Moore (Organ Stud, 33(3): 363-387, 2012) in which the application of virtue ethics to business organizations was investigated empirically in the UK, based on a conceptual framework drawn from MacIntyre's work (After Virtue 2007). Comparing these results with an equivalent study in Sri Lanka, the paper finds that the categories are meaningful but that there are both similarities to and considerable differences in the content of these categories from the UK study. The paper draws on aspects of institutional theory to explore and explain these findings. Overall, there is supportive evidence that the categories of MacIntyrean virtue ethics are generalizable, and so can be used to characterize problems of organizational virtue and vice around the world, while providing evidence that there may be polities which are more conducive to the 'practice-like conduct of production' (Keat, Philos Manag, 7(1): 77-91, 2008).
机译:本文试图确定适用于商业组织的MacIntyrean美德伦理学的类别在非西方商业环境中是否有意义。这样做是基于Moore(Organ Stud,33(3):363-387,2012)中报道的研究,在该研究中,基于MacIntyre的概念框架,在英国对商业组织对美德伦理学的应用进行了实证研究。工作(《美德》 2007年之后)。将这些结果与在斯里兰卡进行的等效研究进行比较,论文发现这些类别是有意义的,但与英国研究的这些类别的内容既有相似之处,又有相当大的差异。本文利用制度理论的各个方面来探索和解释这些发现。总体而言,有支持性证据表明,麦金太尔美德伦理学的类别是可概括的,因此可用于表征世界范围内的组织美德和恶行问题,同时提供证据表明可能存在更有利于“实践- (Keat,Philos Manag,7(1):77-91,2008)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号