首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >From 'Whodunit' to 'How': Detective Stories and Auditability in Qualitative Business Ethics Research
【24h】

From 'Whodunit' to 'How': Detective Stories and Auditability in Qualitative Business Ethics Research

机译:从'whodunit'到'如何':定性商业道德研究中的侦探故事和审计性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Ethical considerations in today's businesses are manifold and range from human rights issues and the well-being of employees to income inequality and environmental sustainability. Regardless of the specific topic being investigated, an integral part of business ethics research consists of deeply comprehending the personal meanings, intentions, behaviors, judgements, and attitudes that people possess. To this end, researchers are often encouraged to use more qualitative methods to understand the dynamic and fuzzy field of business ethics, which involves collecting in-depth information in real time. Qualitative methods in business ethics research, however, raise the two-fold responsibility of not only conducting such investigations fairly and appropriately, but also clearly communicating the research processes and outcomes to readers. Especially leading journals in the field such as Journal of Business Ethics have a responsibility to conduct their business (i.e., the business of high standard publishing) ethically, by making sure that their content represents clear and honest communications of research concerning a wide range of business systems. Unfortunately, the question of how to effectively facilitate transparent insight into the research process of qualitative business ethics studies is still unresolved. Both the lack of a clear communication of methods and results and the iterative nature of qualitative methods often make it difficult for the readers to properly assess a qualitative business ethics study and understand its results. We propose the use of narratives to remedy this situation. Specifically, we suggest a new classification of audits, named second-party audits, to facilitate a better understanding of research procedures ex-post for the readers. To illustrate this new narrative-based reconceptualization of audits, we use Agatha Christie's detective novel The Murder on the Links as a frame of reference.
机译:当今业务中的道德考虑因素是多方面的,从人权问题和员工的福祉到收入不平等和环境可持续性。无论被调查的具体主题如何,商业道德研究的一个组成部分包括深入了解人们拥有的个人含义,意图,行为,判断和态度。为此,往往鼓励研究人员使用更多的定性方法来了解商业道德的动态和模糊领域,这涉及实时收集深入信息。然而,商业道德研究的定性方法,不仅提高了两倍的责任,不仅可以公平和适当地进行此类调查,而且还明确向读者传达研究流程和结果。特别是商业道德杂志等领域的领先期刊,通过确保他们的内容代表有关各种业务的研究清晰诚实的沟通系统。不幸的是,如何有效促进透明洞察定性商业道德研究的研究过程仍未得到解决。缺乏明确的方法和结果沟通以及定性方法的迭代性质往往使读者难以正确评估定性的商业道德研究并理解其结果。我们建议使用叙述来解决这种情况。具体而言,我们建议审计的新分类,命名为第二方审核,以便于更好地了解读者前职位的研究程序。为了说明这种基于审计的新的叙述性化,我们使用Agatha Christie的侦探小说作为参考框架的链接谋杀。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号