首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >How Friedman's View on Individual Freedom Relates to Stakeholder Theory and Social Contract Theory
【24h】

How Friedman's View on Individual Freedom Relates to Stakeholder Theory and Social Contract Theory

机译:弗里德曼的个人自由观如何与利益相关者理论和社会契约理论相关

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Friedman's view on corporate social responsibility (CSR) is often accused of being incoherent and of setting rather low ethical standards for managers. This paper outlines Friedman's ethical expectations for corporate executives against the backdrop of the strong emphasis he puts on individual freedom. Doing so reveals that the ethical standards he imposes on managers can be strictly deduced from individual freedom and that these standards involve both deontological norms and the fulfillment of particular stakeholder expectations. These insights illustrate the necessity to reconsider how Friedman's approach relates to other important normative theories of business ethics. Contrasting Friedman's approach with stakeholder theory and integrative social contract theorywhen considering the importance he assigns to individual freedomshows how and why these approaches differ. Still, the comparison also highlights striking similarities. This paper contributes to a better understanding of Friedman's positionwhich is still one of the most influential approaches in business ethics researchbecause it enables a differentiated look at its strengths and weaknesses.
机译:弗里德曼(Friedman)关于企业社会责任(CSR)的观点经常被指责为不协调,并为管理人员设定了较低的道德标准。本文概述了弗里德曼(Friedman)在强调个人自由的背景下对公司高管的道德期望。这样做表明,他强加给管理者的道德标准可以严格地从个人自由中推导出来,而这些标准既涉及道义规范,也涉及特定利益相关者的期望。这些见解说明了重新考虑弗里德曼的方法与其他重要的商业道德规范理论之间的关系的必要性。在考虑弗里德曼的方法与利益相关者理论和社会契约论的对比时,考虑到弗里德曼对个人自由的重视,就说明了这些方法如何以及为什么不同。尽管如此,比较也突出了惊人的相似之处。本文有助于更好地理解弗里德曼的立场,因为它可以区分其优缺点,因此仍然是商业道德研究中最具影响力的方法之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号