...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Bisexuality >Refusing Butler's Binary: Bisexuality and Performative Melancholia in Mrs. Dalloway
【24h】

Refusing Butler's Binary: Bisexuality and Performative Melancholia in Mrs. Dalloway

机译:拒绝巴特勒的双星:达洛维夫人的双性恋和表现性忧郁症

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In The Psychic Life of Power, Judith Butler argued a woman “accomplishes” normative femininity by rejecting same-sex pleasure. Butler further argues that normative femininity is maintained by emulating, without fully embodying, cultural ideals of femininity. Yet two questions remain: Given the theoretical framework that Butler articulated, what happens to the bisexual subject who forecloses neither homosexuality nor heterosexuality? If masculinity and femininity are, as Butler suggested, not only accomplishments, but also cultural ideals, what happens to the subject who fails to properly emulate these cultural ideals? Following Clare Hemming's suggestion that bisexual readings can be an “enlightening analytical tool or starting point for knowledge” within the broader history of sexuality, this article argues that in Mrs. Dalloway, Virginia Woolf explores precisely this tension between desire and socially sanctioned femininity through her depiction of three female characters: Sally Seton, Clarissa Dalloway, and Clarissa's rival Doris Kilman. Whereas Sally effectively forecloses her same-sex desire, fully “accomplishing” heterosexuality and consolidating normative femininity, Clarissa perceives her bisexuality as a “failure” to fully foreclose homosexual desire and feels that she has lost normative femininity. Clarissa's loss is further exacerbated by her daughter's friendship with Doris. Rather than read this loss of femininity as mere “gender anxiety” (as Butler might), however, this article returns to the idea of femininity as cultural ideal and argues that Clarissa and Doris exhibit performative melancholia, a melancholia where the subject experiences normative gender performativity as a lost ideal. It is this perceived loss of femininity that ultimately motivates much of Clarissa's behavior, including her rivalry with Doris.
机译:在《权力的心理生活》中,朱迪思·巴特勒(Judith Butler)辩称,女性通过拒绝同性快感来“完成”规范的女性气质。巴特勒进一步指出,规范化的女性气质是通过在没有充分体现女性气质的文化理想的情况下进行模仿而维持的。然而,仍然存在两个问题:在巴特勒阐明的理论框架下,对于既不排斥同性恋也不排斥异性恋的双性恋主体发生了什么?如果像巴特勒建议的那样,男性气质和女性气质不仅是成就,而且是文化理想,那么对未能正确地模仿这些文化理想的主体会发生什么?根据克莱尔·海明(Clare Hemming)的建议,在更广泛的性历史中,双性恋阅读可以成为“开明的分析工具或知识的起点”,本文认为,弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫(Dongaray)夫人在弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫(Dalloway)夫人中探讨了欲望与受到社会认可之间的这种张力。通过描绘三个女性角色来展现女性魅力:莎莉·塞顿(Sally Seton),克拉丽莎·达洛维(Clarissa Dalloway)和克拉丽莎的竞争对手多丽丝·基尔曼(Doris Kilman)。 Sally有效地取消了她的同性欲望,完全“实现”了异性恋并巩固了规范的女性气质,而Clarissa则将她的双性恋视为完全丧失了同性恋欲望的“失败”,并感到自己已经失去了规范的女性气质。女儿与多丽丝的友谊进一步加剧了克拉丽莎的损失。然而,这篇文章并没有将女性气质的丧失看成是“性别焦虑”(就像巴特勒可能的那样),而是将女性气质作为文化理想的观点,并辩称克拉丽莎和多丽丝表现出表现性忧郁症,这是受试者的忧郁症。体验规范的性别表现力作为失去的理想。正是这种女性气质的丧失最终促使了克拉丽莎的许多行为,包括与多丽丝的竞争。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号