...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Behavioral Medicine >Mindfulness-based interventions for binge eating: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Mindfulness-based interventions for binge eating: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:基于正念的暴饮暴食干预:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Mindfulness-based interventions are increasingly used to treat binge eating. The effects of these interventions have not been reviewed comprehensively. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to summarize the literature on mindfulness-based interventions and determine their impact on binge eating behavior. PubMED, Web of Science, and PsycINFO were searched using keywords binge eating, overeating, objective bulimic episodes, acceptance and commitment therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, mindfulness, meditation, mindful eating. Of 151 records screened, 19 studies met inclusion criteria. Most studies showed effects of large magnitude. Results of random effects meta-analyses supported large or medium-large effects of these interventions on binge eating (within-group random effects mean Hedge’s g = −1.12, 95 % CI −1.67, −0.80, k = 18; between-group mean Hedge’s g = −0.70, 95 % CI −1.16, −0.24, k = 7). However, there was high statistical heterogeneity among the studies (within-group I 2 = 93 %; between-group I 2 = 90 %). Limitations and future research directions are discussed.
机译:基于正念的干预越来越多地用于治疗暴饮暴食。这些干预措施的效果尚未得到全面审查。这项系统的回顾和荟萃分析旨在总结基于正念干预的文献,并确定其对暴饮暴食行为的影响。使用关键词暴饮暴食,暴饮暴食,客观暴食发作,接受和承诺疗法,辩证行为疗法,正念,冥想,正念饮食来搜索PubMED,Web of Science和PsycINFO。在筛选的151条记录中,有19项研究符合纳入标准。大多数研究表明影响很大。随机效应荟萃分析的结果支持了这些干预措施对暴饮暴食的大或中型效应(组内随机效应意味着Hedge's g = -1.12,95%CI -1.67,-0.80,k = 18;组间平均值对冲的g = −0.70,95%CI −1.16,−0.24,k = 7)。但是,研究之间的统计异质性很高(组内I 2 = 93%;组间I 2 = 90%)。局限性和未来的研究方向进行了讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号