首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Behavioral Decision Making >The test taker's fallacy: How students guess answers on multiple-choice tests
【24h】

The test taker's fallacy: How students guess answers on multiple-choice tests

机译:考生的谬论:学生如何选择多项选择题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many students and applicants take multiple-choice tests to demonstrate their competence and achievement. When they are unsure, they guess the most likely answer to maximize their score. Despite the impact of guessing on test reliability and individual performance, studies have not examined how patterns of answer sequences in multiple-choice tests affect guessing. This research presents the test taker's fallacy, which refers to an individual's tendency to expect a different answer to appear for the next question given a run of the same answer choices. The test taker's fallacy exhibits negative recency, similar to the gambler's fallacy. However, extending the sequential judgment literature, the test taker's fallacy shows that negative recency arises even when sequences may or may not be randomly generated. In three studies, including a survey and experiments, the test taker's fallacy is robustly observed. The test taker's fallacy is consistent with the operation of the representativeness heuristic. This research explains what and how test takers guess given a streak of answers and extends judgment under uncertainty to the test-taking context.
机译:许多学生和申请人参加多项选择测试,以证明他们的能力和成就。当他们不确定时,他们猜测最可能的答案以最大化他们的分数。尽管猜测对测试的可靠性和个人表现有影响,但是研究还没有研究选择题测试中答案序列的模式如何影响猜测。这项研究提出了应试者的谬误,这是指在给定相同答案的情况下,一个人期望下一个问题出现不同答案的趋势。应试者的谬论表现出负的新近度,类似于赌徒的谬论。但是,通过扩展顺序判断文献,应试者的谬误表明,即使序列可能会或可能不会随机生成,也会出现负的新近度。在包括调查和实验在内的三项研究中,可以强烈观察到应试者的谬误。应试者的谬误与代表性启发式的操作一致。这项研究解释了给定一连串答案的应试者猜出了什么以及如何猜测,并将不确定性下的判断扩展到了应试情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号