首页> 外文期刊>Journal of banking & finance >Liquidity risk and policy options
【24h】

Liquidity risk and policy options

机译:流动资金风险及政策选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

On the basis of a liquidity management model, liquidity risks, defined as the probability of payment failures in a real-time gross settlement (RIGS) payment system, may either stem from liquidity management inefficiencies or insufficient cash balances. I will show that penalties charged on the amount of payment failures minimise liquidity risks without interfering with the bank's technology preferences. I will instead show that liquidity requirements, although as effective as penalties to contain the risk of liquidity shortage, may distort the bank's technology preferences and cannot stem liquidity management inefficiencies. I will also show that liquidity risks within RIGS payment systems are potentially smaller because they depend more on the liquidity management efficiency than on the randomness of cash inflows and outflows. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V.
机译:在流动性管理模型的基础上,流动性风险(定义为实时总结算(RIGS)支付系统中支付失败的可能性)可能源自流动性管理效率低下或现金余额不足。我将证明,对付款失败的金额收取的罚款将在不干扰银行技术偏好的情况下最大程度地降低了流动性风险。相反,我将表明,流动性要求虽然与遏制流动性短缺风险的处罚一样有效,但可能会扭曲银行的技术偏好,并且不能阻止流动性管理效率低下。我还将展示RIGS支付系统中的流动性风险可能较小,因为它们更多地取决于流动性管理效率,而不是现金流入和流出的随机性。 (C)2014由Elsevier B.V.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号