...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of banking & finance >Does the buck stop here? A comparison of withdrawals from money market mutual funds with floating and constant share prices
【24h】

Does the buck stop here? A comparison of withdrawals from money market mutual funds with floating and constant share prices

机译:钱在这里停止吗?比较货币市场共同基金与浮动和固定股价的退出

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent reform proposals call for an elimination of the constant net asset value (NAV) or "buck" in money market mutual funds to reduce the occurrence of runs. Outside the United States, there are several countries that have money market mutual funds with and without constant NAVs. Using daily data on individual fund flows from these countries, this paper evaluates whether the reliance on a constant NAV is associated with higher fund redemptions. The data suggest that funds with a constant NAV experienced more negative net flows during the period of the run on the Reserve Primary Fund, even after controlling for measures of fund risk and risk aversion. However, I do not find convincing support for the hypothesis that the effect of sponsor strength on fund flows was stronger for constant NAV money market funds. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:最近的改革建议要求消除货币市场共同基金中的固定资产净值(NAV)或“逆价”,以减少挤兑的发生。在美国以外,有几个国家拥有有和没有固定资产净值的货币市场共同基金。利用来自这些国家的个人资金流量的每日数据,本文评估了对固定资产净值的依赖是否与更高的资金赎回率相关。数据表明,即使在控制了基金风险和风险规避措施之后,资产净值恒定的基金在储备金主基金运行期间的负净流量也更大。但是,对于恒定资产净值货币市场基金,保荐人人数对资金流的影响更强的假设,我没有令人信服的支持。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号