首页> 外文期刊>Journal of banking & finance >The role of investment bankers in M&As: New evidence on Acquirers' financial conditions
【24h】

The role of investment bankers in M&As: New evidence on Acquirers' financial conditions

机译:投资银行家在M&中的作用:关于收购者财务状况的新证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper investigates whether top-tier M&A investment bankers (financial advisors) create value for acquirers with different financial conditions in both the short and long term via analyzing 3420 US deals during 1990-2012. In this paper, deals are divided into three groups based on acquirer financial constraints - acquisitions by constrained, neutral and unconstrained firms. We find that the effects of top-tier bankers are dependent on acquirer financial conditions. Specifically, top-tier advisors improve performance for constrained acquirers rather than neutral, and unconstrained acquirers. Our results show that top-tier investment bankers improve constrained acquirers' short- (5 days) and long-term (36 months) performance by 1.45% and 24.27% respectively, after controlling for firm, deal and market characteristics. For deals with investment banker involvement, constrained acquirers advised by top-tier advisors have the lowest deal completion rate, and pay the lowest bid premiums; while unconstrained acquirers that retain top-tier investment bankers have the highest deal completion rate, and pay relatively high bid premiums. Our findings imply that constrained acquirers tend to retain top-tier investment bankers to gain superior synergy, while unconstrained acquirers appear to retain top-tier investment bankers to ensure the deal completion. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:本文调查了顶级并购投资银行家(财务顾问)是否在1990 - 2012年期间通过分析3420次优惠,为短期和长期提供不同的财务条件的收购人的价值。在本文中,根据收购管理员财务限制 - 通过受约束,中立和无约束公司收购,交易分为三个群体。我们发现,顶级银行家的影响取决于收购者的财务状况。具体而言,顶级顾问可以提高受限制的收购者而不是中立的绩效,而不是无约束的收购者。我们的研究结果表明,在控制公司,交易和市场特征后,顶级投资银行家分别将约束收购者的短期(5天)和长期(36个月)的性能提高1.45%和24.27%。对于投资银行家参与的交易,顶级顾问建议的受限收购者具有最低的交易完成率,并支付最低的投标保费;虽然保留了顶级投资银行家的无疑收购者具有最高的交易完成率,并支付相对高的投标保费。我们的研究结果意味着受约束的收购者倾向于保留最具投资银行家,以获得卓越的协同作用,而无限制的收购者似乎保留了顶级投资银行家,以确保交易完成。 (c)2018年elestvier b.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号