首页> 外文期刊>Journal of banking & finance >Do analysts really anchor? Evidence from credit risk and suppressed negative information
【24h】

Do analysts really anchor? Evidence from credit risk and suppressed negative information

机译:分析师真的是锚吗?信用风险和压制否定信息的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent findings indicate that stock analysts suffer from anchoring bias as they anchor their earnings per share forecasts on the industry median without making sufficient adjustments. Using a sample of firms rated by Standard and Poor's, we determine that this finding is concentrated in the worst rated firms, especially around credit rating downgrades. The driving force of the finding is that stock analysts suppress negative information for high credit risk stocks by dropping coverage instead of issuing low earnings per share forecasts, especially around credit rating downgrades. Our finding explains not only why stock analysts seem to suffer from anchoring bias, but also why analysts are overly optimistic for high credit risk stocks.
机译:最近的调查结果表明,股票分析师遭受锚定偏见,因为它们锚定每股盈利预测行业中位数而不进行足够的调整。使用标准和穷人评估的公司样本,我们确定这一发现集中在最糟糕的公司,特别是在信用评级下调。该发现的驱动力是股票分析师通过删除覆盖率来抑制高信用风险股票的负面信息,而不是每股预测的低收入,特别是在信用评级下调。我们的发现不仅解释了为什么股票分析师似乎遭受锚定偏见,而且为什么分析师对高信用风险股票过于乐观态度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号