首页> 外文期刊>Journal of banking & finance >Do analysts really anchor? Evidence from credit risk and suppressed negative information
【24h】

Do analysts really anchor? Evidence from credit risk and suppressed negative information

机译:分析师真的锚吗?来自信用风险和抑制负面信息的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent findings indicate that stock analysts suffer from anchoring bias as they anchor their earnings per share forecasts on the industry median without making sufficient adjustments. Using a sample of firms rated by Standard and Poor's, we determine that this finding is concentrated in the worst rated firms, especially around credit rating downgrades. The driving force of the finding is that stock analysts suppress negative information for high credit risk stocks by dropping coverage instead of issuing low earnings per share forecasts, especially around credit rating downgrades. Our finding explains not only why stock analysts seem to suffer from anchoring bias, but also why analysts are overly optimistic for high credit risk stocks.
机译:最近的发现表明,股票分析师在没有进行充分调整的情况下将其每股收益预测锚定在行业中位数上,因此遭受了锚定偏差的困扰。使用标准普尔(Standard and Poor's)评级的公司样本,我们确定这一发现集中在评级最差的公司,尤其是信用评级被下调的公司。这一发现的驱动力在于,股票分析师通过降低覆盖范围而不是发布低每股收益预测(尤其是在信用评级下调附近)来抑制高信用风险股票的负面信息。我们的发现不仅解释了为什么股票分析师似乎遭受锚定偏见的困扰,而且还解释了为什么分析师对高信用风险股票过于乐观。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号