...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Physics >Simulating thermal explosion of cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine-based explosives: Model comparison with experiment
【24h】

Simulating thermal explosion of cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine-based explosives: Model comparison with experiment

机译:模拟环三亚甲基三硝胺类炸药的热爆炸:与实验的模型比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We compare two-dimensional model results with measurements for the thermal, chemical, and mechanical behavior in a thermal explosion experiment. Confined high explosives (HEs) are heated at a rate of 1℃/h until an explosion is observed. The heating, ignition, and deflagration phases are modeled using an Arbitrarily Lagrangian-Eulerian code (ALE3D) that can handle a wide range of time scales that vary from a structural to a dynamic hydrotime scale. During the preignition phase, quasistatic mechanics and diffusive thermal transfer from a heat source to the HE are coupled with the finite chemical reactions that include both endothermic and exothermic processes. Once the HE ignites, a hydrodynamic calculation is performed as a burn front propagates through the HE. Two cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine-based explosives, C-4 and PBXN-109, are considered, whose chemical-thermal-mechanical models are constructed based on measurements of thermal and mechanical properties along with small scale thermal explosion measurements. The simulated dynamic response of HE confinement during the explosive phase is compared to measurements in larger scale thermal explosion tests. The explosion temperatures for both HEs are predicted to within 5℃. Calculated and measured wall strains provide an indication of vessel pressurization during the heating phase and violence during the explosive phase. During the heating phase, simulated wall strains provide only an approximate representation of measured values indicating a better numerical treatment is needed to provide accurate results. The results also show that more numerical accuracy is needed for vessels with lesser confinement strength. For PBXN-109, the measured wall strains during the explosion are well represented by the ALE3D calculations.
机译:我们将二维模型结果与热爆炸实验中热,化学和机械行为的测量结果进行比较。密闭高炸药(HE)以1℃/ h的速度加热,直到观察到爆炸。加热,点火和爆燃阶段使用任意拉格朗日-欧拉码(ALE3D)进行建模,该码可以处理从结构到动态水工时间范围的各种时标。在点火前阶段,准静态力学和从热源到HE的扩散热传递与包括吸热和放热过程在内的有限化学反应结合在一起。 HE点燃后,当燃烧前沿在HE中传播时,将执行流体力学计算。考虑了两种基于环三亚甲基三硝胺的炸药C-4和PBXN-109,其化学-热-机械模型是基于热和机械性能的测量以及小规模的热爆炸测量而构建的。在爆炸阶段,模拟的HE限制条件下的动态响应与大规模热爆炸试验中的测量结果进行了比较。两种HE的爆炸温度预计在5℃以内。计算得出的壁应变可指示加热阶段容器的压力以及爆炸阶段的压力。在加热阶段,模拟的壁应变仅提供测量值的近似表示,表明需要进行更好的数值处理才能提供准确的结果。结果还表明,对于约束强度较小的容器,需要更高的数值精度。对于PBXN-109,爆炸期间测得的壁应变可以通过ALE3D计算很好地表示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号