首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Physics >Validating Raman spectroscopic calibrations of phonon deformation potentials in silicon single crystals: A comparison between ball-on-ring and micro-indentation methods
【24h】

Validating Raman spectroscopic calibrations of phonon deformation potentials in silicon single crystals: A comparison between ball-on-ring and micro-indentation methods

机译:验证硅单晶中声子变形势的拉曼光谱校准:环上球和微压痕方法之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Of main interest in the present work is a quantitative comparison between the phonon deformation potential (PDP) values determined for silicon single crystals by two different calibration methods: (i) a macroscopic method exploiting the stress field developed in a ball-on-ring (biaxial) bending configuration; and (ii) a microscopic method using the residual stress field stored around an indentation print. A comparison between the two methods helps to establish the reliability limits for experimental stress analyses in the (001), (011), and (111) planes of silicon devices by means of polarized Raman spectroscopy. Emphasis is also placed on evaluating the degree of precision involved with using a closed-form equation (i.e., as proposed by other authors), which describes the stress state when different crystallographic planes of the Si sample are loaded in the ball-on- ring jig. A comparison between stress profiles obtained by such equations and those computed by the finite element method (FEM) in the loaded disk reveals a clear discrepancy for the (011) plane. Such a discrepancy could be attributed to elastic coupling and anisotropic effects (particularly relevant along the (011) direction), which can lead to errors up to 15% in computing the stress field stored in the silicon lattice.
机译:当前工作中最主要的兴趣是通过两种不同的校准方法对单晶硅确定的声子形变势(PDP)值之间的定量比较:(i)利用在球形环上产生的应力场的宏观方法(双轴)弯曲配置; (ii)使用存储在压痕印刷物周围的残余应力场的显微方法。两种方法之间的比较有助于通过极化拉曼光谱在硅器件的(001),(011)和(111)平面中建立实验应力分析的可靠性极限。重点还放在评估使用封闭形式方程式(即,由其他作者提出的方程式)所涉及的精确度上,该方程式描述了当硅样品的不同晶体学平面加载到圆环上时的应力状态。跳汰机在加载的盘中通过此类方程获得的应力曲线与通过有限元方法(FEM)计算的应力曲线之间的比较表明,(011)平面存在明显的差异。这种差异可归因于弹性耦合和各向异性效应(尤其是沿(011)方向相关),在计算存储在硅晶格中的应力场时可能导致高达15%的误差。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Applied Physics》 |2011年第9期|p.093511.1-093511.13|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Advanced Technologies Development Laboratory, Panasonic Electric Works Co., Ltd., Kadoma, Osaka 571-8686, Japan,Ceramic Physics Laboratory and Research Institute for Nanoscience, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Sakyo-ku, Matsugasaki, Kyoto 606-8585, Japan;

    Advanced Technologies Development Laboratory, Panasonic Electric Works Co., Ltd., Kadoma, Osaka 571-8686, Japan;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号