...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American statistical association >Likelihood-based Analysis Of Causal Effects Of Job-training Programs Using Principal Stratification
【24h】

Likelihood-based Analysis Of Causal Effects Of Job-training Programs Using Principal Stratification

机译:基于主体分层的基于可能性的职业培训计划因果关系分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Government-sponsored job-training programs must be subject to evaluation to assess whether their effectiveness justifies their cost to the public. The evaluation usually focuses on employment and total earnings, although the effect on wages is also of interest, because this effect reflects the increase in human capital due to the training program, whereas the effect on total earnings may be simply reflecting the increased likelihood of employment without any effect on wage rates. Estimating the effects of training programs on wages is complicated by the fact that, even in a randomized experiment, wages are "truncated" (or less accurately "censored") by nonemployment, that is, they are only observed and well-defined for individuals who are employed. In this article, we develop a likelihood-based approach to estimate the wage effect of the US federally-funded Job Corps training program using "Principal Stratification". Our estimands are formulated in terms of: (1) the effect of the training program on wages for those who would be employed whether they were trained or not, also called the survivor average causal effect (SACE), and the proportion of people in this category; (2) the wages when trained for those who would be employed only when trained, and the proportion of people in this category; (3) the wages when not trained for those who would be employed only when not trained, and the proportion of people in this category; (4) the proportion of people who would be not employed whether trained or not. We conduct likelihood-based analysis using the EM algorithm, and investigate the plausibility of important submodels with scaled log-likelihood ratio statistics. We also conduct a sensitivity analysis with respect to specific parametric assumptions. Our results suggest that all four types of people [(1)-(4) previously] exist, which is impossible under the usual monotonicity assumptions made in traditional econometric evaluation methods.
机译:政府资助的职业培训计划必须接受评估,以评估其有效性是否足以证明其对公众的成本。评估通常侧重于就业和总收入,尽管对工资的影响也很重要,因为这种影响反映了培训计划导致人力资本的增加,而对总收入的影响可能只是反映了就业可能性的增加对工资率没有任何影响。事实是,即使在随机实验中,工资也会被失业“截断”(或更准确地说是“删节”),这就是估计培训计划对工资的影响的复杂性,也就是说,只有针对个人才能观察到并明确定义工资受雇的人。在本文中,我们开发了一种基于可能性的方法,该方法使用“主要分层”来估算美国联邦资助的Job Corps培训计划的工资效果。我们的估算依据如下:(1)培训计划对无论是否受过培训的受雇人员的工资影响,也称为幸存者平均因果效应(SACE),以及该比例中的人员比例类别; (2)仅受过培训的人员受过培训的工资,以及该类别人员的比例; (三)未受过培训的人员的未受培训工资,以及该类别人员的比例; (4)不论是否受过训练将不被雇用的人数比例。我们使用EM算法进行基于似然性的分析,并通过对数似然比统计数据研究重要子模型的合理性。我们还针对特定的参数假设进行了敏感性分析。我们的结果表明,所有四种类型的人都存在[[(1)-(4)以前],在传统计量经济学评估方法中通常的单调性假设下这是不可能的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号