...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Planning Association >Delivering Transportation Infrastructure Through Public-Private Partnerships
【24h】

Delivering Transportation Infrastructure Through Public-Private Partnerships

机译:通过公私伙伴关系提供运输基础设施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Problem: The types of public-private partnerships (PPPs) in which private sector partners take on increased responsibility for project design, construction, financing, and operation have become popular in the United States and around the world as means of delivering large-scale transportation infrastructure. However, it is unclear what implications this model of project delivery has for planning theory and practice as distinct from public policy more generally.rnPurpose: I aim to develop a set of criteria on which to evaluate the procedural, spatial, design, public policy, and political implications of these PPPs from a planning perspective, and then to examine whether their proposed benefits are matched by real-world experiences.rnMethods: I examine in depth three case studies of transportation projects delivered through such PPPs: the Croydon Tramlink in London, UK; the State Route 91 toll lanes in Orange County, CA; and the Cross City Tunnel in Sydney, Australia.rnResults and conclusions: The short-term and long-term impacts of such PPPs on infrastructure project delivery were different. In the short term, the model was effective at raising funds for new facilities and transferring financial risks to the private sector, but its limited transparency minimized meaningful community engagement in project planning. Ovet the longer term, noncompetition clauses in the concession agreements restricted government flexibility to respond to changing conditions, lawsuits were common as relationships between the partners deteriorated, and all threernconcessions were ultimately sold under duress, two to public sector agencies.rnTakeaway for practice: These PPPs profoundly affected the planning processes for public infrastructure and the outcomes achieved once such facilities were operational. This research identifies the need for new ex ante evaluation tools, risk transfer mechanisms, community engagement processes, and data tracking and performance monitoring procedures, to prevent negative consequences from transportation PPPs.
机译:问题:在美国和世界范围内,私营部门合作伙伴对项目设计,建设,融资和运营负有更大责任的公私伙伴关系(PPPs)已成为在美国和世界范围内流行的大规模运输手段基础设施。但是,目前尚不清楚这种项目交付模式对规划理论和实践与公共政策有何不同,这意味着什么?目的:我的目的是制定一套评估程序,空间,设计,公共政策的标准,从计划的角度来看这些PPP的政治意义,然后研究它们的拟议收益是否与现实经验相匹配。方法:我深入研究了通过此类PPP进行的运输项目的三个案例研究:伦敦的Croydon Tramlink,英国加利福尼亚橙县的91号州际公路收费公路;结果和结论:此类PPP对基础设施项目交付的短期和长期影响是不同的。在短期内,该模型可以有效地筹集新设施的资金,并将财务风险转移给私营部门,但是其透明度有限,使有意义的社区参与项目规划的可能性降至最低。长期来看,特许协议中的非竞争条款限制了政府应对变化的条件的灵活性,随着合伙人之间关系的恶化,诉讼很普遍,所有三项特许权最终都在胁迫下出售,其中两项特许权卖给了公共部门机构。公私合作对公共基础设施的规划过程产生了深远的影响,一旦这些设施投入运营,其成果将得到实现。这项研究确定了需要新的事前评估工具,风险转移机制,社区参与流程以及数据跟踪和绩效监控程序,以防止运输PPP带来负面影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号