首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association >Evaluation of heavy-duty vehicle emission controls with a decade of California real-world observations
【24h】

Evaluation of heavy-duty vehicle emission controls with a decade of California real-world observations

机译:重型车辆排放控制与加州真实世界观测十年的重型车辆排放控制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Over the past decade, efforts to reduce emissions of particulate matter (PM) and oxides of nitrogen (NO + NO_2, or NO_x) from heavy-duty diesel vehicles (HDDVs) have led to the widespread adoption of both Diesel Particulate Filters (DPFs) to control PM and Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) to control NO_x. We evaluated the performance of DPFs and SCR with 13,327 real-world fuel-based Black Carbon (BC) and NO_x emission factors from 9,167 unique heavy-duty vehicles (primarily HDDVs) measured at four sites in California (two ports, two highways) from 2011 to 2018. BC emission factors have decreased by 90% during the past decade. At the same time, BC distributions have become increasingly skewed toward "high-emitters" - e.g., the portion of the HDDV fleet responsible for half of all BC emissions has decreased from ~16% to ~3%. NO_x emission factors have also decreased over the past decade, but by only 31%. They remain roughly five times greater than in-use thresholds.We examined changes in BC and NO_x emissions with engine age. BC emissions from DPF-only trucks decreased slightly but insignificantly, by 6 ± 15 mg/kg fuel per year, while for DPF+SCR trucks they increased by 5 ± 3. These changes are less than 5% of in-use thresholds. The annual increase in NO_x emissions with age was much greater: 1.44 ± 0.28 g/kg for older SCR trucks without on-board diagnostic (OBD) capabilities and 0.48 ± 0.35 for newer trucks with OBD, roughly 20- 50% of in-use thresholds. Paired f-tests on the over 600 vehicles that were observed in multiple campaigns were consistent with these results. Observed changes in BC emissions with age were best fit with a "gross emitter" model assuming an annual DPF failure rate of 0.83 ± 0.01% for DPF-only trucks and 0.56 ± 0.01% for DPF+SCR trucks. Implications: These observations of real-world HDV emission factors have several major implications for regulatory efforts to reduce them. The increasing importance of a relatively small number of high BC emitters suggests that widespread sampling of the on-road fleet will be necessary to identify these vehicles. On the other hand, the much more ubiquitous deterioration in NO_x control measures may be better addressed by incorporating on-board diagnostic systems, with telematic data transfer when possible, into inspection and maintenance programs. These NO_x observations also highlight the need for strengthening heavy-duty SCR durability demonstration requirements.
机译:在过去的十年中,减少颗粒物质(PM)和氮气排放的氮气(NO + NO_2或NO_X)的努力导致柴油颗粒过滤器(DPF)的广泛采用控制PM和选择性催化还原(SCR)以控制NO_X。我们评估了DPFS和SCR的性能与13,327个基于世界燃料的黑碳(BC)和No_X排放因子,从加利福尼亚州(两个港口,两条高速公路)的四个地点测量的9,167个独特的重型车辆(主要是HDDV) 2011年至2018年。过去十年中,公元前发行因素减少了90%。与此同时,BC分布变得越来越偏向“高发射器” - 例如,负责所有BC排放量的一半的HDDV舰队的部分从〜16%降至约3%。在过去的十年中,No_X排放因子也减少,但只有31%。它们保持比使用阈值大约五倍。我们在发动机时代的BC和NO_X排放中检查了变化。只有DPF的卡车的BC排放量略微下降但每年略微减少6±15毫克/千克/克燃料,而DPF + SCR卡车它们的增加5±3.这些变化小于使用阈值的5%。年龄的NO_X排放的年增长率大得多:1.44±0.28克/千克/千克/千克/千克,旧的SCR卡车没有车载诊断(OBD)能力,对于具有OBD的较新卡车0.48±0.35,大约为20-50%门槛。在多个广告系列中观察到的超过600辆车的配对F检验与这些结果一致。观察到年龄的BC排放的变化最适合“总发射极”模型,假设DPF卡车的年度DPF故障率为0.83±0.01%,为DPF + SCR卡车0.56±0.01%。含义:这些现实世界HDV排放因子的观察对减少监管努力有几个重大影响。相对少量的高BC发射商的重要性越来越重要表明,需要在路上舰队的广泛采样来识别这些车辆。另一方面,通过在可能的诊断系统中,可以更好地解决NO_X控制措施的更普遍存在的劣化,以便在可能的情况下,电信数据传输到检查和维护程序。这些NO_X观察也强调了加强重型SCR耐用性示范要求的需求。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association》 |2021年第10期|1277-1291|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Research Division California Air Resources Board Sacramento CA USA;

    Office of Community Air Protection California Air Resources Board Sacramento CA USA;

    Research Division California Air Resources Board Sacramento CA USA;

    Monitoring and Laboratory Division California Air Resources Board Sacramento CA USA;

    Mobile Source Laboratory Division California Air Resources Board Sacramento CA USA;

    Mobile Source Laboratory Division California Air Resources Board Sacramento CA USA;

    Research Division California Air Resources Board Sacramento CA USA;

    Research Division California Air Resources Board Sacramento CA USA;

    Mobile Source Laboratory Division California Air Resources Board Sacramento CA USA;

    Research Division California Air Resources Board Sacramento CA USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号