...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the air & waste management association >Spatial and Temporal Characterization of PM_(2.5) Mass Concentrations in California, 1980-2007
【24h】

Spatial and Temporal Characterization of PM_(2.5) Mass Concentrations in California, 1980-2007

机译:1980-2007年加利福尼亚州PM_(2.5)质量浓度的时空特征

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Systematic measurement of fine particulate matter (aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 μm [PM_(2.5)]) mass concentrations began nationally with implementation of the Federal Reference Method (FRM) network in 1998 and 1999. In California, additional monitoring of fine particulate matter (PM) occurred via a dichotomous sampler network and several special studies carried out between 1982 and 2002. The authors evaluate the comparability of FRM and non-FRM measurements of PM_(2.5) mass concentrations and establish conversion factors to standardize fine mass measurements from different methods to FRM-equivalent concentrations. The authors also identify measurements of PM_(2.5) mass concentrations that do not agree with FRM or other independent PM_(2.5) mass measurements. The authors show that PM_(2.5) mass can be reconstructed to a high degree of accuracy (r~2 > 0.9; mean absolute error ~2 μg m~(-3)) from PM with an aerodynamic diameter ≤10 μm (PM_(10)) mass and species concentrations when site-specific and season-specific conversion factors are used and a statewide record of fine PM mass concentrations by combining the FRM PM_(2.5) measurements, non-FRM PM_(2.5) measurements, and reconstructions of PM_(2.5) mass concentrations. Trends and spatial variations are evaluated using the integrated data. The rates of change of annual fine PM mass were negative (downward trends) at all 22 urban and 6 nonurban (Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments [IMPROVE]) monitoring locations having at least 15 yr of data during the period 1980-2007. The trends at the IMPROVE sites ranged from -0.05 to -0.25 μg m~(-3) yr~(-1) (median -0.11 μg m~(-3) yr~(-1)), whereas urban-site trends ranged from -0.13 to -1.29 μg m~(-3) yr~(-1) (median -0.59 μg m~(-3) yr~(-1)). The urban concentrations declined by a factor of 2 over the period of record, and these decreases were qualitatively consistent with changes in emissions of primary PM_(2.5) and gas-phase precursors of secondary PM. Mean PM_(2.5) mass concentrations ranged from 3.3 to 7.4 μg m~(-3) at IMPROVE sites and from 9.3 to 37.1 μg m~(-3) at urban sites.
机译:细颗粒物(空气动力学直径小于2.5μm[PM_(2.5)])质量浓度的系统测量是从1998年和1999年在美国实施的联邦参考方法(FRM)网络的全国范围内开始的。在加利福尼亚州,对细颗粒物( PM)是通过二分采样器网络发生的,并且在1982年至2002年之间进行了几项特殊研究。作者评估了FRM和PMR(2.5)质量浓度的非FRM测量的可比性,并建立了转换因子以标准化不同方法进行的精细质量测量到FRM等效浓度。作者还确定了PM_(2.5)质量浓度的测量结果与FRM或其他独立的PM_(2.5)质量测量结果不一致。作者表明,PM_(2.5)质量可以从气动直径≤10μm的PM重构到较高的精度(r〜2> 0.9;平均绝对误差〜2μgm〜(-3))。 10))使用站点特定和季节特定的转换因子时的质量和物种浓度,并通过组合FRM PM_(2.5)测量,非FRM PM_(2.5)测量和重构来实现细颗粒PM浓度的全州记录PM_(2.5)质量浓度。使用集成数据评估趋势和空间变化。在1980年至2007年期间,至少有15年数据的22个城市和6个非城市(受保护视觉环境的机构间监测[IMPROVE])监测点,年均PM量的变化率均为负(下降趋势)。 IMPROVE站点的趋势范围为-0.05至-0.25μgm〜(-3)yr〜(-1)(中位数为-0.11μgm〜(-3)yr〜(-1)),而城市站点的趋势范围为-0.13至-1.29μgm〜(-3)yr〜(-1)(中位数为-0.59μgm〜(-3)yr〜(-1))。在记录期间,城市浓度下降了2倍,这些下降在质量上与一次PM_(2.5)和二次PM的气相前体排放量变化一致。 IMPROVE站点的PM_(2.5)平均质量浓度范围为3.3至7.4μgm〜(-3),城市站点的平均PM_(2.5)质量浓度范围为9.3至37.1μgm〜(-3)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号