...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of African Economies >Industrialisation for Structural Transformation in Africa: Appropriate Roles for the State
【24h】

Industrialisation for Structural Transformation in Africa: Appropriate Roles for the State

机译:非洲工业化促进结构转型:国家的适当作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The majority of African countries recognise the need for structural transformation. They acknowledged this need very early after attaining independence some five decades ago. Unfortunately, such transformation has eluded them while success has been observed in many parts of East Asia. There are obvious questions to be asked about the different outcomes observed. In trying to find explanations for the different outcomes, the literature shows that a major difference has been the role and capabilities of the state. While the state pursued transformation through industrial policy in a systematic way in many East Asian countries, such a systematic approach has not been observed in most parts of Africa. It is obvious that African countries can learn some principles from East Asia in the pursuit of structural transformation. They can set clear goals for transformation and develop clear strategies for achieving the goals. They can also assign specific roles to institutions and individuals in the implementation of strategies. But most importantly, they must show commitment to industrial policy and stick with the agreed policies, making periodic modifications and adjustments when necessary. In choosing goals for industrial policy, African governments cannot lose sight of current capabilities and endowments. They must be guided by how they want to be positioned in a changing global economy. This is what will drive them to develop specific policies that can make them replace fast-growing East Asian economies, such as China, as they move on to other levels in their transformation. In choosing strategies, African countries need to accept that it is not simply a case of ‘government versus market’. Nor is it ‘horizontal versus vertical industrial policies’. They will find that ‘import-substitution versus export promotion’ is no longer a dichotomous issue. Being pragmatic and consistent after making the right choices is the way forward.
机译:大多数非洲国家认识到结构转型的必要性。他们在大约五十年前获得独立后很早就承认了这一需要。不幸的是,尽管东亚许多地区都取得了成功,但这种转变却使他们望而却步。关于观察到的不同结果,存在明显的问题要问。在试图找到对不同结果的解释时,文献表明,主要的区别在于国家的作用和能力。尽管在许多东亚国家中,国家通过产业政策以系统的方式追求转型,但在非洲的大部分地区却未观察到这种系统的方式。显而易见,非洲国家可以在进行结构转型时向东亚学习一些原则。他们可以设定明确的转型目标,并制定实现目标的明确策略。他们还可以在战略实施中为机构和个人分配特定角色。但最重要的是,他们必须表现出对产业政策的承诺,并遵守商定的政策,并在必要时进行定期修改和调整。在选择产业政策目标时,非洲各国政府不能忽视当前的能力和捐赠。他们必须以他们希望如何适应不断变化的全球经济为指导。这就是驱使他们制定具体政策,使其在转型过程中迈向其他层次的努力,从而使其能够取代快速增长的东亚经济体(例如中国)。非洲国家在选择策略时需要接受的是,这不仅仅是“政府与市场”的情况。也不是“横向与纵向产业政策”。他们会发现,“进口替代与出口促进”不再是两分问题。做出正确的选择后保持务实和一致是前进的道路。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号