首页> 外文期刊>Journal of advertising research >Single versus Multiple Measurement of Attitudes: A Meta-Analysis of Advertising Studies Validates the Single-Item Measure Approach
【24h】

Single versus Multiple Measurement of Attitudes: A Meta-Analysis of Advertising Studies Validates the Single-Item Measure Approach

机译:态度的单次测量与多次测量:广告研究的荟萃分析验证了单项测量方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Academic researchers tend to use multiple items to measure a construct reliably, whereas practitioners tend to use single-item measures. But when constructs such as brand attitude, attitude toward the advertisement, and attitude toward behaviors are double concrete-with a clear, singular meaning in which the object being rated also is clear and singularly identifiable-a single-item measure suffices (Rossiter, 2011). Using the results of 189 advertising studies, the authors found no difference in effect sizes when the double-concrete dependent variables were measured with single or multiple items-which means data collection is more efficient and less tedious. That is good news for advertising researchers in an era of ever-decreasing response rates and attention spans of respondents.
机译:学术研究人员倾向于使用多个项目来可靠地度量结构,而从业者倾向于使用单个项目的度量。但是,当品牌态度,对广告的态度和对行为的态度等结构是双重具体的时,具有清晰,单一的含义,即被评估的对象也清晰,可唯一地识别—单项测量就足够了(Rossiter,2011 )。使用189个广告研究的结果,当使用单个或多个项目测量双混凝土因变量时,作者发现效果大小没有差异,这意味着数据收集更加高效且乏味。在回应率和受访者关注度不断下降的时代,这对广告研究人员而言是个好消息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号