首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Accounting Research >Discussion of Disclosure Practices of Foreign Companies Interacting with U.S. Markets
【24h】

Discussion of Disclosure Practices of Foreign Companies Interacting with U.S. Markets

机译:外国公司与美国市场互动的披露惯例的讨论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

KPS provide compelling evidence that the level of interactions a non-U.S. firm has with the U.S. capital, product, and labor markets is associated with the use of U.S. disclosure practices. This paper should broaden the focus of the literature beyond simple capital market incentives for disclosure into a recognition that managers must trade off interactions in other markets as well to determine the optimal to disclosure policy. The paper also provides interesting suggestive evidence on the debate over international convergence in governance systems by finding that there has been partial convergence in disclosure practices with a U.S. model both at the country and firm level. Finally, KPS use a new disclosure index provided by S&P that has many promising future applications. Future research should build on KPS's ambitious start to investigate the following areas. First, the use of time-series data and separate examinations of mandatory and voluntary disclosure practices could provide more insight into the degree of convergence in countries' institutions versus convergence in firm's practices and on the causality of the relations between disclosure practices and product and labor market interactions. To answer these questions, researchers could used detailed CIFAR and S&P data to identify countries and firms with big changes in disclosure practices over time and countries with different emphases in disclosure areas. Another interesting context for answering these questions would be to identify countries where there is limited interaction at the country level but significant interactions for a few firms. Second, small sample, clinical, or experimental studies could provide more evidence on exacdy which deviations from U.S. disclosure practices (quantity, quality, or format) create significant costs for U.S. market participants and on how managers trade off domestic, U.S., and other foreign interactions in choosing disclosure practices. Now that KPS have provided large-sample cross-sectional evidence of these relations, the biggest payoff to future researchers will likely come to those who construct their own disclosure indexes and hand collect proxy data tailored to the specific research questions within powerful contexts.
机译:KPS提供了令人信服的证据,表明非美国公司与美国资本,产品和劳动力市场之间的互动程度与美国披露惯例的使用有关。本文应该将文献的关注范围从简单的资本市场激励披露范围扩展到人们认识到管理者必须权衡其他市场的相互作用以及确定最优的披露政策。该论文还发现,在国家和公司层面上,采用美国模式的披露实践已经部分收敛,从而为治理体系国际趋同的辩论提供了有趣的暗示性证据。最后,KPS使用标准普尔提供的新的披露指数,该指数具有许多有希望的未来应用。未来的研究应以KPS雄心勃勃的开始为基础,以调查以下领域。首先,使用时间序列数据以及对强制性和自愿性披露惯例的单独检查可以提供更多信息,以了解国家机构的趋同程度与企业惯例的趋同程度以及披露惯例与产品和劳动之间的因果关系市场互动。为了回答这些问题,研究人员可以使用详细的CIFAR和S&P数据来确定随着时间的流逝,披露实践发生重大变化的国家和公司,以及在披露领域重点不同的国家。回答这些问题的另一个有趣的背景是,确定在国家/地区层面互动有限但对于少数公司而言互动明显的国家。其次,小样本,临床或实验研究可以提供更多证据,证明与美国披露惯例(数量,质量或格式)的背离会给美国市场参与者带来重大成本,以及管理者如何权衡国内,美国和其他外国人的利益选择披露惯例的互动。既然KPS已经提供了这些关系的大样本横截面证据,那么将来的研究人员最大的收益可能就是那些建立自己的披露指数并在有力的背景下手工收集针对特定研究问题的代理数据的人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号