...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of accounting, auditing & finance >Reexamining the Relationship Between Audit and Nonaudit Fees: Dealing With Weak Instruments in Two-Stage Least Squares Estimation
【24h】

Reexamining the Relationship Between Audit and Nonaudit Fees: Dealing With Weak Instruments in Two-Stage Least Squares Estimation

机译:重新审视审计费用与非审计费用之间的关系:处理两阶段最小二乘估计中的弱工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The authors introduce some new econometric tests and techniques for identifying and overcoming the problem of weak instruments in the context of joint provision of audit and nonaudit fees. The authors use this context because identifying appropriate instruments is difficult due to the lack of theoretical guidance as well as due to the difficulty in intuitively identifying instruments that satisfy the econometric requirements. The authors introduce a battery of empirical tests based on recent developments in econometrics to test for the appropriateness of the instruments. The authors then illustrate two approaches of using instruments from existing data: the size industry average portfolio approach and the synthetic-instrument approach. Although the approach using synthetic instruments sidesteps issues of identifying proxies with desirable properties, it requires some stringent assumptions that cannot be directly tested. However, as a methodological alternative, this approach can be used for robustness tests. The authors find that when the instruments are not weak, audit and nonaudit fees are positively associated. This relationship holds for audit and tax-related nonaudit fees as well. Overall, the evidence suggests the existence of economies of scope benefits from the joint supply of audit and nonaudit services. Methodologically, the authors illustrate the importance of testing the appropriateness of the instruments utilized when accounting for endogeneity.
机译:作者介绍了一些新的计量经济学测试和技术,用于在联合提供审计和非审计费用的情况下识别和克服工具薄弱的问题。作者之所以使用这种环境,是因为缺乏理论上的指导,以及由于难以直观地识别出满足计量经济学要求的工具,因此很难找到合适的工具。作者基于经济计量学的最新发展介绍了一系列实证测试,以测试仪器的适用性。然后作者阐述了使用现有数据中的工具的两种方法:规模行业平均投资组合方法和合成工具方法。尽管使用合成工具的方法避开了标识具有所需属性的代理的问题,但它需要一些无法直接测试的严格假设。但是,作为方法的替代方法,此方法可用于鲁棒性测试。作者发现,当工具不弱时,审计费用和非审计费用是正相关的。这种关系也适用于审计和与税收相关的非审计费用。总体而言,证据表明范围经济的存在受益于审计和非审计服务的联合供应。从方法上讲,作者说明了在考虑内生性时测试所用工具的适当性的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号