...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of accounting & economics >Did the SEC impact banks' loan loss reserve policies and their informativeness?
【24h】

Did the SEC impact banks' loan loss reserve policies and their informativeness?

机译:SEC是否会影响银行的贷款损失准备金政策及其信息性?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

During the late 1990s, the SEC alleged that banks were overstating loan loss allowances to establish cookie jar reserves. Their intervention in bank accounting culminated in 2001 with new guidance (SAB 102) designed to improve financial reporting quality. We show that banks' allowance estimation changed in response to the SEC's intervention. While allowance informativeness (as proxied by the ability to explain future losses) improved for Strong Banks, informativeness declined for Weak Banks whose incentives are to understate allowances. Our results help to explain why some (Weak) banks delayed loss recognition during the recent financial crisis.
机译:在1990年代后期,SEC指控银行高估了贷款损失准备金,以建立饼干罐储备。他们对银行会计的干预最终在2001年以旨在提高财务报告质量的新指南(SAB 102)告终。我们表明,银行的备抵金估算是根据SEC的干预而变化的。尽管强健银行的备抵信息性(由解释未来损失的能力所支持)得到改善,但弱势银行的信息性却下降了,其动机是低估备抵。我们的结果有助于解释为什么一些(弱)银行在最近的金融危机期间延迟了损失确认。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号