首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Academic Ethics >Does the Type of Cheating Influence Undergraduate Students' Perceptions of Cheating?
【24h】

Does the Type of Cheating Influence Undergraduate Students' Perceptions of Cheating?

机译:作弊的类型会影响大学生对作弊的看法吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There has been a plethora of studies outlying the various factors which may affect undergraduate student cheating, generally focusing on individual, situational and deterrent factors. But beyond these factors, does the type of cheating affect students' perceptions of cheating? We found that there were differences in regards to gradable cheating such as cheating on homework, tests and papers versus non-gradable cheating such as illegally downloading software/music from the Internet or photocopying materials which violate the university's academic integrity policy. Gender, discussion of ethical issues in class and enforcement of cheating reduces the acceptance of cheating across types of cheating. Less time spent on the Internet reduces the acceptance of only non-gradable cheating and the type of institution and knowing the consequences of cheating reduces the acceptance of only gradable cheating.
机译:有大量的研究未涉及可能影响大学生作弊的各种因素,通常侧重于个人,情况和威慑因素。但是,除了这些因素之外,作弊的类型还会影响学生对作弊的看法吗?我们发现,在可分级作弊方面,例如在作功课,考试和试卷上作弊,与在非分级作弊方面(例如从互联网上非法下载软件/音乐或影印材料)存在差异,这违反了大学的学术诚信政策。性别,课堂道德问题的讨论和作弊的执行会降低对各种作弊行为的接受程度。花费在Internet上的时间更少,减少了仅接受非分级作弊的方式和机构的类型,而了解作弊的后果则减少了仅接受非分级作弊的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号