...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology >Relational Aggression and Hostile Attribution Biases: Testing Multiple Statistical Methods and Models
【24h】

Relational Aggression and Hostile Attribution Biases: Testing Multiple Statistical Methods and Models

机译:关系攻击和敌对归因偏见:测试多种统计方法和模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The present study used both categorical and dimensional approaches to test the association between relational and physical aggression and hostile intent attributions for both relational and instrumental provocation situations using the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development longitudinal Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development (M = 8.3 years-old, SD = 0.19, N = 840). A one standard deviation threshold was used to create categorical aggression status groups. In categorical analyses, children who were both relationally and physically aggressive were found to attribute more hostile intent attributions in relationally provocative situations. Results from the dimensional analyses indicated that female gender, physical aggression, and hostile attribution biases for instrumental provocations each predicted increases in relational aggression over time. Further, relational aggression was not predictive of hostile attribution biases for relational provocations, and instead physical aggression was predictive. Implications for the fields of developmental psychology and psychopathology are discussed.
机译:本研究使用类别和维度方法,使用美国国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所的纵向研究,对关系和工具性挑衅情况下的关系和身体侵略以及敌对意图归因之间的关系进行了测试(M = 8.3岁,SD = 0.19,N = 840)。一个标准偏差阈值用于创建分类攻击状态组。在分类分析中,发现在关系挑衅的情境中,既具有关系性又具有身体攻击性的孩子会归因于更多的敌意意图。维度分析的结果表明,女性,身体攻击和工具性挑衅的敌对归因偏见均预测了随着时间的推移,关系攻击会增加。此外,关系攻击不能预测关系挑衅的敌对归因偏见,而身体攻击可以预测。讨论了对发展心理学和精神病理学领域的启示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号