...
首页> 外文期刊>The joint commission journal on quality and patient safety >Exploring the Association Between Organizational Culture and Large-Scale Adverse Events: Evidence from the Veterans Health Administration
【24h】

Exploring the Association Between Organizational Culture and Large-Scale Adverse Events: Evidence from the Veterans Health Administration

机译:探索组织文化与大规模不良事件之间的关联:来自退伍军人健康管理局的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Large-scale adverse events (LSAEs) involve unsafe clinical practices stemming from system issues that mayaffect multiple patients. Although literature suggests a supportive organizational culture may protect against system-relatedadverse events, no study has explored such a relationship within the context of LSAEs. This study aimed to identify whetherstaff perceptionsoforganizationalculturewereassociatedwithLSAEincidence.Methods: The team conducted an exploratory analysis using the 2008–2010 data from the US Department of VeteransAffairs (VA) All Employee Survey (AES). LSAE incidence was the outcome variable in two facilities where similar infectioncontrol practice issues occurred, leading to LSAEs. For comparison, four facilities where LSAEs had not occurred wereselected, matched on VA–assigned facility complexity and geography. The AES explanatory factors included workgroup-level (civility, employee engagement, leadership, psychological safety, resources, rewards) and hospital-level Likert-type scalesfor four cultural factors (group, rational, entrepreneurial, bureaucratic). Bivariate analyses and logistic regressions were performed,with individual staff as the unit of analysis from the anonymous AES data.Results: Responses from 209 AES participants across the six facilities in the sample indicated that the four comparisonfacilities had significantly higher mean scores compared to the two LSAE facilities for 9 of 10 explanatory factors. Theadjusted analyses identified that employee engagement significantly predicted LSAE incidence (odds ratio = 0.58, 95%confidence interval = 0.37–0.90).Conclusion: Staffat the two exposure facilities in this study described their organizational culture to be less supportive.Lower scores in employee engagement may be a contributing factor for LSAEs.
机译:背景:大规模不良事件(LSAES)涉及不安全的临床实践,这些临床实践可能从系统问题中发出影响多个患者。虽然文学表明支持性的组织文化可能会保护与系统相关的不良事件,没有研究在LSAE的背景下探讨了这种关系。本研究旨在确定是否员工感知oforgorationalculturewereassoCientwithlsaeinceed。方法:该团队采用来自美国退伍军人部2008 - 2010年数据进行了探索性分析事务(VA)所有员工调查(AES)。 LSAE发病率是两种设施中的结果变量,在其中相似感染控制实践问题发生,导致LSAES。相比之下,没有发生LSAE的四个设施选中,匹配VA分配的设施复杂性和地理。 AES解释因素包括工作组 - 水平(文明,员工参与,领导力,心理安全,资源,奖励)和医院级李克特型秤对于四个文化因素(集团,理性,创业,官僚主义)。进行双变量分析和逻辑回归,随着个别员工作为匿名AES数据分析的单位。结果:在样本中六个设施的209 AES参与者的回复表明四个比较与10个解释因素中的9种相比,设施比较高的平均分数。这调整后的分析确定了员工参与明显预测LSAE发病率(差价率= 0.58,95%置信区间= 0.37-0.90)。结论:员工员工这项研究中的两项曝光设施描述了他们的组织文化,不那么支持。员工参与中的得分降低可能是LSAE的贡献因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号