...
首页> 外文期刊>The joint commission journal on quality and patient safety >Development and Validation of WeCares, a Survey Instrument to Assess Hospitalized Patients’ and Family Members’ 'W illingness to E ngage in Your Care and S afety'
【24h】

Development and Validation of WeCares, a Survey Instrument to Assess Hospitalized Patients’ and Family Members’ 'W illingness to E ngage in Your Care and S afety'

机译:WeCares的开发和验证,调查工具,以评估住院患者和家庭成员在您的护理和efety中对e nggegage的幻觉'

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Patient engagement is recognized as a method to improve care quality and safety. A research team developed WeCares ( W illingness to E ngage in Your Care and S afety), a survey instrument assessing patients’ and families’ engagement in the safety of their care during their hospital stay. The objective of this study is to establish the preliminary construct validity and internal consistency of WeCares. Methods: WeCares was distributed to patients and families. With the survey responses, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed to identify the factorial structure of WeCares. The internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Descriptive and comparative analysis was also performed to summarize patients’ and families’ responses. Results: A total of 247 patients and families responded to the WeCare survey, of which 224 were used for EFA. EFA resulted in a 13-item, four-factor structure, including (1) comfortable sharing concerns , (2) responsibility for preventing errors , (3) perception of care team members’ attitude , and (4) patients’/families’ role in preventing errors. The Cronbach alphas were 0.716–0.866, indicating acceptable internal consistency. Overall, patients and families were comfortable sharing concerns with clinicians but preferred to remain anonymous. They believed that the care team members hold most responsibility for error prevention, however, and agreed on their ability to help prevent errors. Conclusion: WeCares was developed to assess patients’ and families’ willingness to engage. WeCares can also be used to facilitate conversation about safety concerns and shared responsibility. The study team believes this would lead to patient activation in guarding their own care and ultimately improve patient outcomes and safety.
机译:背景:患者参与被认为是提高护理质量和安全性的方法。一支研究小组在您的医院住宿期间,调查仪器评估患者和家庭在医院休息期间的护理安全方面的威力(您的护理和SHEAGES和S.S的智力)。本研究的目的是建立初步构建措施和内部一致性。方法:将韦克雷斯分发给患者和家庭。通过调查响应,进行探索因子分析(EFA)以识别WeCares的因子结构。使用Cronbach的alpha评估内部一致性。还表演了描述性和比较分析,以总结患者和家庭的反应。结果:共有247名患者和家庭回应WECARE调查,其中224名用于EFA。 EFA导致了一个13项,四因素结构,包括(1)舒适的分享问题,(2)预防错误的责任,(3)护理团队成员的态度感知,(4)患者/家庭的作用在防止错误时。 Cronbach alphas为0.716-0.866,表明内部一致性可接受。总体而言,患者和家庭舒适地与临床医生分享担忧,但宁愿保持匿名。他们认为,护理团队成员对预防犯罪最负责任,并同意他们帮助防止错误的能力。结论:制定了WeCares以评估患者和家庭的偶然意愿。韦尔斯也可以用于促进关于安全问题和共同责任的对话。该研究团队认为这将导致患者激活守卫自己的护理,并最终改善患者的结果和安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号