...
【24h】

Accreditation in European Health Care

机译:欧洲卫生保健认证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: In the past 15 years many countries, with widely differing health systems, have established national accreditation programs. A European survey report on accreditation, which includes data and updates from 2003 that were submitted between January and October 2004, is summarized. Methods: A one-page questionnaire was circulated, with the summary of the 2002 survey, in February 2004 to known contacts in 44 of the larger states in the European Region of the World Health Organization. Combining the surveys of 2000, 2002, and 2004, responses were received from 36 of the 44 larger countries of the European Region from which information was sought. Findings: The number of national accreditation programs for health services has continued to grow since the mid-1990s. By 2004, 26 programs were active or in development in 18 countries. The "English-speaking" model of North America remains the leading influence; however, newer programs are increasingly influenced by other models. Governmental programs are more likely to publish findings of accreditation assessments, and more recent programs are more likely to make results public. Discussion: Accreditation programs are being set up more frequently in Europe than anywhere else; the trend is from voluntary, confidential, and self-financed organizational development toward benign but transparent regulation of stakeholders, governmental support, and public funding. Programs vary widely, yet patient and staff mobility, cross-border purchasing, freedom of trade, and protection of public safety and patients' rights imply the need for a common approach to definition, assessment, and improvement of standards in health care.
机译:背景:在过去的15年中,许多卫生系统差异很大的国家建立了国家认证计划。总结了一份欧洲认证报告,其中包括2004年1月至2004年10月提交的2003年数据和更新。方法:于2004年2月向2002年调查摘要分发了一份一页的调查表,调查对象是世界卫生组织欧洲区域44个较大州的已知联系人。结合2000年,2002年和2004年的调查,从欧洲地区的44个较大的国家中的36个收到了答复,从中寻求信息。结果:自1990年代中期以来,国家卫生服务认证计划的数量一直在增长。到2004年,在18个国家中正在实施或正在开发26个计划。北美的“说英语”模式仍然是主要影响力。但是,更新的程序越来越受其他模型的影响。政府计划更有可能发布认可评估的结果,而最新的计划则更有可能将结果公开。讨论:在欧洲,认可计划的建立频率高于其他任何地方;趋势是从自愿,保密和自负盈亏的组织发展到利益相关者,政府支持和公共资金的良性但透明的监管。计划千差万别,但是患者和工作人员的流动性,跨境购买,贸易自由以及对公共安全和患者权利的保护意味着需要采用通用方法来定义,评估和改善医疗保健标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号