...
首页> 外文期刊>The John Marshall journal of computer and information law >THE PROBLEMS WITH PRISM: HOW A MODERN DEFINITION OF PRIVACY NECESSARILY PROTECTS PRIVACY INTERESTS IN DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS
【24h】

THE PROBLEMS WITH PRISM: HOW A MODERN DEFINITION OF PRIVACY NECESSARILY PROTECTS PRIVACY INTERESTS IN DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS

机译:棱镜存在的问题:隐私的现代定义如何保护数字通信中的隐私利益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The omnipresence of the Internet and its necessity to everyday life means that traditional notions of privacy vested in property are becoming increasingly antiquated. In their law review article, Warren and Brandeis advocated for a general privacy right that was not tied to property interests, but rather they chose to advocate instead for an individual's right to his personality. Over time the Court made strides in expanding privacy interests from those based strictly on property to those based on society's general expectation.
机译:互联网的无处不在及其对日常生活的必要性意味着,归属于财产的传统隐私观念正日益过时。沃伦(Warren)和布兰代斯(Brandeis)在其法律评论文章中主张不与财产利益相关的一般隐私权,而是选择主张个人的人格权。随着时间的推移,法院在将隐私利益从严格基于财产的利益扩展到基于社会普遍期望的利益方面取得了长足的进步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号