...
首页> 外文期刊>Issues in Science and Technology >The Limits of Knowledge Personal and Public
【24h】

The Limits of Knowledge Personal and Public

机译:个人和公共知识的局限性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

One of the most basic assumptions underlying much of Western thinking is that individuals are rational beings, able to form judgments based on empirical information and logical deliberations in their quest for a course of action most suited to advancing their goals. This is assumed to be true for personal choices and for societal ones—that is, for public policies. A common narrative is that people used to be swayed by myths, folktales, and rituals (with religion sometimes added in), but the Enlightenment ushered in the Age of Reason, in which we are increasingly freed from traditional beliefs and instead rely on the findings of science. Progress is hence in the cards, driven by evidence. This assumption was first applied to nature, as we learned to crack its codes and employ its resources.
机译:西方思维的最基本假设之一是个人是理性的人,能够根据经验信息和逻辑思考做出判断,以寻求最适合实现其目标的行动方案。对于个人选择和社会选择(即公共政策),都认为这是正确的。一个常见的叙述是,人们曾经被神话,民间传说和仪式(有时加入宗教)所左右,但启蒙运动迎来了理性时代,在理性时代,我们越来越摆脱传统信仰,转而依赖于发现科学。因此,在证据的推动下,进步是有规律的。当我们学会破解自然密码并利用其资源时,这种假设首先应用于自然。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Issues in Science and Technology 》 |2012年第1期| p.49-56| 共8页
  • 作者

    AMITAI ETZIONI;

  • 作者单位

    Elliott School of International Affairs at George Washington University in Washington, DC;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号