...
首页> 外文期刊>Irrigation Science >Use of thermal units to estimate corn crop coefficients under semiarid climatic conditions
【24h】

Use of thermal units to estimate corn crop coefficients under semiarid climatic conditions

机译:在半干旱气候条件下使用热量单位估算玉米作物系数

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two crop coefficient equations were derived as a function of fraction of thermal units from lysimeter measured corn evapotranspiration (ETc-lys) during 1997 and 1998, and reference evapotranspiration obtained from: (a) lysimeter measurements (Kcmes) or FAO Penman-Monteith (ETo-PM) estimates (Kcest-PM). For validation, corn evapotranspiration (ETc-est) was estimated in 2005 and 2006 from ETo-PM and: (a) the equation for Kcmes with (ETc-est-lyslc) or without (ETc-est-lys) locally calibrated ETo-PM; (b) the equation for Kcest-PM; and (c) the FAO approach (ETc-est-FAO). The ETc-est_lys estimates showed the lowest bias (0.09 mm day?1); the ETc-est-PM and ETc-est-FAO, the highest (0.50-0.51 mm day?1). However, the root mean square error (RMSE, 1.23–1.27 mm day?1) and the index of agreement (IA, around 0.94) of the ETc-est-lys, ETc-est-lyslc and ETc-est-PM were similar. Therefore, ETc-est-lys is recommended although the ETc-est-lyslc was similarly accurate. The ETc-est-PM is less recommended due to poorer bias and systematic mean square error, and a general underestimation except for low corn ET values. For real time irrigation scheduling, the ETc-est-FAO should be avoided as RMSE (1.35 mm day?1), IA (0.93) and bias were slightly worse, corn ET was overestimated but for high values, and the length of the four phenological stages must be known in advance.
机译:从1997年和1998年用渗渗仪测得的玉米蒸散量(ETc-lys )导出了两个作物系数方程,作为热量单位分数的函数,而参考蒸散量则来自:(a)溶渗仪测量值(Kcmes )或FAO Penman-Monteith(ETo-PM )估算值(Kcest-PM )。为了进行验证,2005年和2006年根据ETo-PM 估算了玉米的蒸散量(ETc-est ),并且:(a)Kcmes的方程式为(ETc-est-lyslc )或不使用(ETc-est-lys )本地校准的Eto-PM ; (b)Kcest-PM的方程式; (c)粮农组织的方法(ETc-est-FAO )。 ETc-est_lys 估计值显示出最低的偏差(0.09 mm天?1 ); ETc-est-PM 和ETc-est-FAO 最高(0.50-0.51 mm天?1 )。然而,ETc-est-lyslc,ETc-est-lyslc的均方根误差(RMSE,1.23-1.27 mm天?1 )和一致性指数(IA,约0.94) 和ETc-est-PM 相似。因此,尽管ETc-est-lyslc 具有相同的准确性,但仍建议使用ETc-est-lys 。不推荐使用ETc-est-PM ,这是因为较差的偏差和系统的均方误差,以及除玉米ET值较低外的普遍低估。对于实时灌溉计划,应避免使用ETc-est-FAO ,因为RMSE(1.35毫米天?1 ),IA(0.93)和偏差稍差,玉米ET被高估了,但高值,以及四个物候阶段的长度,必须事先知道。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Irrigation Science》 |2008年第4期|335-345|共11页
  • 作者

    A. Martínez-Cob;

  • 作者单位

    Estación Experimental Aula Dei (CSIC) Apdo. 202 50080 Zaragoza Spain;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号