...
首页> 外文期刊>Irrigation Science >Use of thermal units to estimate corn crop coefficients under semiarid climatic conditions
【24h】

Use of thermal units to estimate corn crop coefficients under semiarid climatic conditions

机译:在半干旱气候条件下使用热量单位估算玉米作物系数

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two crop coefficient equations were derived as a function of fraction of thermal units from lysimeter measured corn evapotranspiration (ET sub(c-lys)) during 1997 and 1998, and reference evapotranspiration obtained from: (a) lysimeter measurements (Kc sub(mes)) or FAO Penman-Monteith (ET sub(o-PM)) estimates (Kc sub(est-PM)). For validation, corn evapotranspiration (ET sub(c-est)) was estimated in 2005 and 2006 from ET sub(o-PM) and: (a) the equation for Kc sub(mes) with (ET sub(c-est-lyslc)) or without (ET sub(c-est-lys)) locally calibrated ET sub(o-PM); (b) the equation for Kc sub(est-PM); and (c) the FAO approach (ET sub(c-est-FAO)). The ET sub(c-est_lys) estimates showed the lowest bias (0.09 mm day super(-1)); the ET sub(c-est-PM) and ET sub(c-est-FAO), the highest (0.50-0.51 mm day super(-1)). However, the root mean square error (RMSE, 1.23-1.27 mm day super(-1)) and the index of agreement (IA, around 0.94) of the ET sub(c-est-lys), ET sub(c-est-lyslc) and ET sub(c-est-PM) were similar. Therefore, ET sub(c-est-lys) is recommended although the ET sub(c-est-lyslc) was similarly accurate. The ET sub(c-est-PM) is less recommended due to poorer bias and systematic mean square error, and a general underestimation except for low corn ET values. For real time irrigation scheduling, the ET sub(c-est-FAO) should be avoided as RMSE (1.35 mm day super(-1)), IA (0.93) and bias were slightly worse, corn ET was overestimated but for high values, and the length of the four phenological stages must be known in advance.
机译:根据热量测定仪在1997年和1998年的玉米蒸散量(ET sub(c-lys))导出两个作物系数方程,作为热量单位的函数,参考蒸发量可从以下公式获得:(a)溶氧仪测量值(Kc sub(mes)) )或FAO Penman-Monteith(ET sub(o-PM))估算值(Kc sub(est-PM))。为了验证,2005年和2006年通过ET sub(o-PM)和(a)Kc sub(mes)方程与(ET sub(c-est- lyslc))或不包含(ET sub(c-est-lys))本地校准的ET sub(o-PM); (b)Kc sub(est-PM)的方程; (c)粮农组织的方法(ET sub(c-est-FAO))。 ET sub(c-est_lys)估计值显示出最低的偏差(0.09 mm天,super(-1)); ET子(c-est-PM)和ET子(c-est-FAO),最高(0.50-0.51毫米天super(-1))。但是,ET子(c-est-lys),ET子(c-est)的均方根误差(RMSE,1.23-1.27 mm天超(-1))和一致性指数(IA,约0.94) -lyslc)和ET sub(c-est-PM)相似。因此,尽管ET sub(c-est-lyslc)同样准确,但还是建议使用ET sub(c-est-lyslc)。不推荐使用ET sub(c-est-PM),因为偏倚和系统均方误差差,并且除玉米ET值较低外,普遍低估了该值。对于实时灌溉计划,应避免使用ET sub(c-est-FAO),因为RMSE(1.35毫米日间super(-1)),IA(0.93)和偏差稍差一些,玉米ET被高估了,但数值较高,并且必须预先知道四个物候阶段的长度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号