...
首页> 外文期刊>Iranian journal of chemistry & chemical engineering >Consequences Modeling of the Akçagaz Accident through Land Use Planning (LUP) Approach
【24h】

Consequences Modeling of the Akçagaz Accident through Land Use Planning (LUP) Approach

机译:通过土地利用规划(LUP)方法对阿卡加兹事故的后果建模

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In the study, consequences analysis of Akcagaz LPG Facilities accident was conducted. The consequences analysis, modeling studies were performed by the use of EFFECTS 10.0 Software over two liquefied gas LOC (Loss of Containment) scenarios. One of the scenarios was G1: Instantaneous release corresponding to BLEVE (Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapor Explosion) and the other was G2: Release in 10 min corresponding to UVCE (Unconfined Vapor Cloud Explosion). The highest threat zone distance (1kW/m(2) heat radiation distance) was_determined as 1699 m, the lethal burn distance as 377 m and distance from the center cloud to threshold overpressure as 342.46 m with the G1 scenario. French, Italian and Austrian methodologies relating to LUP (Land Use Planning) context of the Seveso Directive, which was not implemented in Turkish legislation, were evaluated for BLEVE of The Akcagaz Accident. Three different modeling approaches for BLEVE including static, dynamic and rupture of the vessel were used and the results were compared to the LUP methodology. The value (height of the fire ball: 273m) closed to the actual accident situation (height of the fire ball:200-300m) was obtained with the use of the static modeling approach. The distance access to fragments of the tank was calculated as 409 m with the use of rupture of vessel modeling approach which was compatible with the actual accident value (similar to 500m). High lethality, the beginning of lethality, irreversible effects, indirect/reversible effects radius of The Akcagaz Accident were calculated for each country LUP methodology. The determined distances with the use of static BLEVE model correlation were obtained at the highest value again. High lethality radius was determined for French and Italian as 173.37 m and 86.13 m, respectively. The LUP methodology used in France is said to be more restrictive based on the large impact distances. On the other hand, when the TOTAL specifications (GS EP SAF 253& 262) are considered, which are dependent on demand but very important, the threshold values for health effects are seen to be much more stringent.
机译:在研究中,对阿卡加兹石油气设施事故进行了后果分析。通过使用EFFECTS 10.0软件对两种液化气LOC(密闭性损失)场景进行了后果分析和建模研究。一种情况是G1:对应于BLEVE(沸腾液体膨胀蒸气爆炸)的瞬时释放,另一种情况是G2:在10分钟内对应于UVCE(无限制蒸气云爆炸)的释放。在G1情景下,最高威胁区距离(1kW / m(2)散热距离)确定为1699 m,致命燃烧距离为377 m,从中心云到阈值超压的距离为342.46 m。针对塞维索指令的LUP(土地使用规划)背景的法语,意大利语和奥地利方法(未在土耳其法律中实施)进行了评估,以评估阿卡卡兹事故的BLEVE。使用了三种不同的BLEVE建模方法,包括容器的静态,动态和破裂,并将结果与​​LUP方法进行了比较。使用静态建模方法获得接近实际事故情况的值(火球高度:273m)(火球高度:200-300m)。通过使用与实际事故值(类似于500m)相适应的容器破裂方法,计算出到坦克碎片的距离为409 m。针对每个国家的LUP方法,计算了高致死率,致死率的开始,不可逆影响,阿克卡加兹事故的间接/可逆影响半径。再次使用静态BLEVE模型相关性确定的距离再次获得最大值。法国和意大利的高致死率分别确定为173.37 m和86.13 m。据说基于大的碰撞距离,法国使用的LUP方法更具限制性。另一方面,当考虑到TOTAL规范(GS EP SAF 253和262),这取决于需求但非常重要时,对健康影响的阈值被认为要严格得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号